eduzhai > Physical Sciences > Physics Sciences >

Reply to “Critical Comments on the Paper ‘On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of Relativity’”

  • Save

... pages left unread,continue reading

Document pages: 12 pages

Abstract: It has been critically argued by V. A. Leus (SobolevInstitute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk, Russia) that in my proof that Einstein’sSpecial Theory of Relativity is logically inconsistent and therefore false, Iviolated the basic tenets of Special Relativity and foisted an alternativetheory upon Einstein’s. A careful study of the critical analysis revealshowever a failure to address the key arguments I adduced to prove SpecialRelativity logically inconsistent, and a concomitant invocation of Einstein’stheory to try to argue that my analysis is incorrect because it does not concurwith Einstein. There is therefore no proof advanced of any alleged error in myanalysis. In my paper I did not introduce an alternative theory. Theaforementioned critical paper affords opportunity in rebuttal to amplify theinvalidity of A. Einstein’s tacit assumption, in constructing the SpecialTheory of Relativity, that systems of clock-synchronised stationary observersconsistent with Lorentz Transformation can be mathematically constructed. Sincesuch systems of observers have in fact no mathematical existence the SpecialTheory of Relativity is logically inconsistent. It is therefore invalid. Theconsequences for physics, astronomy, and cosmology, are significant.

Please select stars to rate!


0 comments Sign in to leave a comment.

    Data loading, please wait...