Effects of infertility, EQ and resilience on marital satisfaction in Indian couples
- (0) Download
https://www.eduzhai.net International Journal of Applied Psychology 2013, 3(3): 31-37 DOI: 10.5923/j.ijap.20130303.01 Role of Infertility, Emotional Intelligence and Resilience on Marital Satisfaction among Indian Couples D. Barani Ganth1,*, S. Thiyagarajan2, Nigesh3 1Department of Applied Psychology, Pondicherry University , Pondicherry, India 2Department of International Business, Pondicherry University , Pondicherry, India 3Trainee Clinical Psychologist, Department of Psychology, Calcutta University, Kolkatta, India Abstract Only a few researchers have studied the role of infertility and other psychological factors on marital satisfaction among Indian couples. The main objective of this study is to explore the role of infertility and selected psychological variables on the marital satisfaction of the couples and to see whether infertility interact with gender to influence the level of marital satisfaction. Standardized Scales on marital satisfaction, resilience and emotional intelligence were ad min istered to patients who visited infertility clinics and a matched group of normal indiv iduals fro m the commun ity. Infert ile wo men were less satisfied in their marital life than their husbands. Infertility and gender had an interaction effect on marital satisfaction. In a regression model, gender, emotional intelligence, resilience and status of infertility emerged as significant predictors of marital satisfaction. Being an infertile Indian wo man is definitely disadvantageous compared to the males and the psychological factors like emot ional intelligence and resilience could influence the marital satisfaction in the context of infert ility. Keywords Infert ility, Emot ional Intelligence, Resilience, Marital Satisfaction, Ind ian Couples 1. Introduction Within the Indian Culture, the mean ing of marriage and marital satisfaction differs between d ifferent sub cultural groups and it has evolved over the period time. Marital satisfaction (also referred to as marital quality and marital happiness) is defined as one's subjective evaluation of favorability towards her/his spouse and the marital relationship. It is concerned with how a marriage functions during its existence and how each partner feels about it. Marital satisfaction is a mental state that reflects the perceived benefits and costs of marriage to a particular person. The more cost a marriage partner inflicts on the other the less satisfied s/he generally is with the ma rriage and with the marriage partner. Similarly, the greater the perceived benefits are, the mo re satisfied one is with the marriage and with the marriage partner. Until recently, marriage was an institution that could not be easily dissolved in India, which is evident in terms of the lower divorce rates. However, in the modern and globalised India, things have changed drastically. Though there are no officia l statistics with regard to the divorce rate in India, magazine reports claim that divorce rate is increasing fro m the previous level of 1.1 %. While considering the different factors that influence marital * Corresponding author: baranikanth77@gm ail.com (D. Barani Ganth) Published online at https://www.eduzhai.net Copyright © 2013 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved satisfaction, a number o f differences have been found between women and men’s views on the quality of their relationships. Men and women have different set of roles to be played so they see and evaluate relationships differently (in terms of parenting and intimacy). Heaton and Blake suggested that wives’ were mo re focused and gave greater importance to relationship so their opinion on relationship satisfaction is mo re precise. It is evident that gender med iates to some extent in determining the degree of satisfaction. While considering the role of gender in determining the ma rita l satisfaction, a serious threat to the relationship could be an infertility d iagnosis of one of the partners. Infert ility has been relatively neglected as both a health problem and a subject for social science research in South Asia, as in the developing world. Researchers linking the infertility and the divorce rate had found a strong association between them. One exp lanation for th is result could be that infert ile couples tend to revisit their choice of the spouse and they constantly attribute the spouse as a reason for infertility. Studies conducted in India have revealed that eleven percent of wo men agree that a man should leave h is wife if she fails to conceive, but fewer than three percent agree that a woman should leave her husband if he is unable to give her a child.Remarriage becomes a handy option for men when the wife is infert ile whereas the decision is not well accepted for a wo men when her husband is infertile. Even in situation when a woman is ready for a remarriage, her value as a potential spouse is severely reduced and if she has to remarry someone who is less desirable than her first spouse. Also, 32 D. Barani Ganth et al.: Role of Infertility, Emotional Intelligence and Resilience on M arital Satisfaction among Indian Couples the process of remarriage delays the start of childbearing and further reduces chances of fertility.These results show the effect of infert ility diagnosis on marital quality, though infert ility problem may not be resolved by just changing the s p ous e. There is little evidence on the levels and patterns of infert ility in India. National Family Health Survey-2 estimated that 3.8 % of married wo men in the age group of 40 to 49 are childless. According to 1981 Census, childlessness among married wo men in India is about 6 %. Co mmunity-based studies in India too suggested similar rate of child lessness across the country.On the effect of infertility on family, many researches have reported that infertility creates psychological distress among couples, though these studies found a gender difference wherein wo men were more distressed than men. Studies done on infertile couples also found communication problems, conflict, d isagreement over medical treat ment and lack of empathy between them.While wo men are affected in terms of their gender identity men are affected in terms of their sexual inadequacy, low self-esteem and anxiety.A study done on 120 east Indian infert ile couples found differences in response to infertility based on the cause of the infertility. Men expressed the effect on their personality and social behaviour where as women with in fertility problem showed symptoms of depression. Generally, an xiety levels were significantly higher in the partner with the fertility problem. While studying the role of infertility on marital life of couples, the med iating ro le o f psychological variables also should be taken into account. Previous studies linking infert ility, gender and marital quality of couples have left considerable gap on exp loring the role o f these variables, though some studies have touched upon it. For examp le, one study on emotional impact on in fertility found that couples with equal level of social infertility stress and need for parenthood showed greater level of marital adjustment and had higher level of marital satisfaction than the ones with dissimilar level o f infertility stress. Women were more likely to develop depression when their level of infert ility stress and urge to become parent are different fro m that of their partners. Studies lin king marital quality and emot ional bonding have suggested the role of emotionality in moderating the issues between couples and in turn improving their marital adjustment. Durana ca me out with a finding that emotional bonding is significantly related to marital quality and Bonding and Emotional Re-education (BER) can lead to an imp rovement in relationship dynamics such as marital adjustment, cohesion and personality dynamics like self-esteem, and an xiety levels. Studies linking Emot ional Intelligence and Marital satisfaction showed that accuracy in expressing and recognizing emotions correlates with couples’ reports of marital happiness. Studies have established the close relationship between emotional intelligence and marital satisfaction among couples. It was found that sensitivity and accuracy in nonverbal communication predicts happiness.Emotional regulat ion, one of the components of emotional intelligence had been identified as an important trait as studies found that happy spouses are more likely to be accommodative and retaliate less during conflict than unhappy spouses. Unlike emotional intelligence, which is considered as a trait, resilience is a phenomenon of overcoming stress or adversity despite the experience of situations that have shown risk of development of pathology. Studies linking resilience and marital satisfaction had reported mixed results. A study explored the relat ionship between resilience and marital satisfaction in caregivers of spouses with dementia. The results showed that when a husband or wife feels greater caregiver burden, in terms of looking after the partner, they reported less marital satisfaction but in case of older caregivers, the marital satisfaction was more. Ho wever, the study found that resiliency, gender, and stage of cognitive impairment were not related to marital satisfaction. Another study linking resiliency to economic stress found that high marital support reduced the association between economic p ressure and emotional d istress, thus adding resilience against economic crisis in the family. In addition to the resiliency effect, effect ive couple problem solving reduced the adverse influence of marital conflict on marital d is tress  . The reviews on marital quality or satisfaction give us some of the correlates of marital quality. These reviews enabled us to include some of them as variables in the present study as there are not many studies available that have looked into the way emot ional intelligence, resilience and infert ility play a role in marital satisfaction. In this context, we focus on the relationship and interaction among these variables, keeping the Indian context in mind. In the light of the above facts, the present study had the following research questions. 1. Whether there is a gender difference with regard to the level of marital satisfaction for fe rtile and infe rtile couples. 2. Whether infertility and gender have an interaction effect in determin ing the level o f marital satisfaction. 3. Whether Emotional Intelligence and Resilience have any influence on marital satisfaction of ma rried couples. 2. Materials and Methods The idea behind the present study is to examine the effect of gender, infert ility, emot ional intelligence and resilience on marital satisfaction which is the contentment in marital life. A pilot study was conducted on a small samp le, sized 50, to assess the practicability and reliability of the questionnaire and scales used for the study. 3. Measures Emot ional Intelligence was measured using Emotional Intelligence Inventory consisting 50 items on a five point Likert scale. The tool is relating to a person’s emotional development, maturity, general mental health. More International Journal of Applied Psychology 2013, 3(3): 31-37 33 specifically, it tends to measure moderation in one’s emotional responses, ability to read correctly the mental state of others and regulate one’s own behavior in accordance with it, proper goal o rientation, ab ility to behave suitably in accordance with the demands of the situation, sense of humor, ability to create and maintain good personal relationships, balance in emotions. Items such as “I am fully aware of my potentials”, “I have the ability to read the mind of others” are part of the measure. The reliability out of the pilot study was 0.821 and was also evaluated for factorial validity and was found to be satisfactory. Resilience was measured using Bharathiar Un iversity Resilience Scale. It consists of 30 items on a five point Likert scale with a possible score range of 30-150. The scale measures different do mains of resilience such as Duration taken to get back to normalcy, Reaction to negative events, Response to risk factors (specifically d isadvantaged environment) in life, Perception of effect of past negative events, Defining ‘Problems’, Hope/Confidence in coping with future and Openness to experience and Flexib ility. The scale possesses satisfactory content and concurrent validity. Reliab ility fro m the pilot study was found to be 0.761. Marital satisfaction was measured using marital satisfaction scale. The scale measures the social, emotional, interpersonal and sexual sources of satisfaction in marriage. It consists of 30 questions. Most of the questions, however, indicate the presence of high marital satisfaction when answered positively. The authors reported adequate reliability and validity for the scale. The scale’s reliability on the pilot study was found to be 0.741. 4. Procedure The study was conducted on a sample of 160 individuals out of which 80 o f them (36 males and 44 females) are infert ile individuals who came fo r consultancy in various fertility clinics in and around two south Indian cities. A group of 80 normal indiv iduals having at least one child (20 males, 60 females) matched in terms of socio economic backgrounds were included in the study. The sampling procedure for the infertile group was mult istage with random at the first stage and convenience sampling in the second. At the first stage, fertility clinics in and around the two cities were identified fro m which five fro m each city were selected at random. In the second stage, the people who were v isiting the clinics were selected on the basis of convenience and availability. They answered the questionnaires in the waiting room of the clinics. For inclusion in the normal group (fert ile) members fro m the nearby suburban community area with matching demographic features were approached individually at their residence by the researchers. Willing participants were asked to fill in the questionnaires.. Hypotheses were framed and tested using Univariate Analysis of Variance and Regression Model was used on the data to see the effect of independent variables and its quantumon the dependant variable. Hypotheses framed were HO1: There is no effect o f Gender on Marital Satisfaction. HO2: There is no effect of infertility on marital satisfaction. HO3: There is no interaction effect of Gender and Infert ility on Marital Satisfaction. 6. Results The descriptive statistics table shows the frequency, mean and std. deviation of the respondents on marital satisfaction. It can be seen that men are more satisfied in their ma rita l life than women and their SD is less imply ing that there is less variation among them in satisfaction, the difference in satisfaction is also statistically significant at 1% for t test. Fertile group are more satisfied in their marital life than the infert ile group as their t test result is significant at 5%. The interesting finding is that among the in fertile group men are more satisfied and are less worried about infertility than wo men, which is reiterated by the t, test results and it is significant at 1%. On the other hand, there is no difference in satisfaction between men and wo men among the fert ile group, which is a control group for the study. Fro m this, it can be said that wo men in Ind ia are mo re worried about infert ility in marriage than men and infertility is mostly associated with wo men. Table 2 is about Univariate analysis of variance of two independent variables Gender and Infertility. Even though differences between these groups have been seen in the previous table through, t test but they were not seen at the bivariate level by controlling the effect of other variable, which was attempted in the above table. Fro m the table it can be said that there is an effect of gender on marital satisfaction and infertility on marital satisfaction at bivariate level also, which are significant at 1% imply ing there is a significant difference in satisfaction among male & female and fertile & infert ile groups. There is also an interaction effect of gender and infertility on marital satisfaction, which means gender and infertility works together on marital satisfaction that is infert ile men and infertile wo men have different levels of satisfactions but this difference does not exist between fertile men and wo men. The results of Regression analysis are d iscussed in Tab le 3 and 4. R square for the model is 0.32 wh ich means 32% of the change in marital satisfaction is explained by Emot ional Intelligence, Resilience, Infertility and Gender. Durb in Watson statistics is around 2 indicating no auto correlation in the residuals. ANOVA is significant at 1% so the models hold good. 5. Statistics 34 D. Barani Ganth et al.: Role of Infertility, Emotional Intelligence and Resilience on M arital Satisfaction among Indian Couples Table 1. Descriptive st at ist ics on Marital Sat isfact ion Male Female Infertile Fertile Frequency Marital satisfaction Mean Std. Deviation t - test 56 104 49.00 46.69 5.96 6.32 -5.747*** 80 80 44.90 50.10 5.73 5.72 -2.248** * 10% significance, ** 5% significance, *** 1% significance Infert ile Male Female 36 44 48.00 42.36 3.45 6.00 -5.262*** Fert ile Male Female 20 60 50.80 49.87 8.70 4.39 -0.461 Source Corrected Model Int ercept Infert ile Gender Infertile * Gender Error Tot al Corrected Total Table 2. Difference Bet ween Groups (ANOVA) Sum of Squares 1723.685 311445.266 905.956 368.356 188.770 4532.315 367256.000 6256.000 df Mean Square 3 574.562 1 311445.266 1 905.956 1 368.356 1 188.770 156 29.053 160 159 F 19.776 1.072E4 31.183 12.679 6.497 Sig. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.012 Table 3. Summary Statistics and ANOVA R R Square Adjust ed R Square Std. Error of the Estimate DurbinW at so n Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 1997.461 4 499.365 18.176 0.000 0.565 0.319 0.302 5.242 2.059 Residual Tot al 4258.539 155 27.474 6256.000 159 Table 4. Regression Results Co n st ant E.I Resilience Infert ile Gender Unstandardized Coefficients B 18.560 0.059 0.071 5.185 2.909 Std. Error 4.302 0.028 0.038 0.868 0.924 St an dardized Co efficient s Bet a 0.166 0.155 0.415 0.222 t 4.314 2.079 1.971 5.977 3.147 Sig. .000 0.039 0.050 0.000 0.002 Collinearity St at ist ics Tolerance VIF 0.688 0.664 0.912 0.883 1.453 1.507 1.096 1.132 Table.4 g ives regression results indicating the effects of the independent variables Emotional Intelligence, Resilience, Infertility and Gender on the dependent variable, Marital satisfaction. Regression assumptions like normality o f the data and colllinearity between variables were examined and was found to be fit for the analysis. Variab les are normally distributed and there is no collinearity between Emot ional Intelligence and Resilience as the tolerance and VIF are with the manageable limits i.e >0.1 & <10. As gender and infertility are categorica l variables they are dummied in the model. Emotional Intelligence, Resilience, Gender and Infertility are significant influencers and predictors of marital satisfaction as the t values are significant at 5% and 1% respectively. As Emot ional Intelligence increases by a unit marital satisfaction will also increase by 0.059 units and if Resilience increases by a unit Marital satisfaction will also increase by 0.071. If a person moves fro m in fertile to fert ile group his marital satisfaction will increase by 5.19 units. If there is a change in gender fro m female to male the marital satisfaction will increase by 2.91 units.. Fro m this it can be concluded that infertility followed by gender have a major ro le to play in marital satisfaction with Emotional Intelligence and Resilience playing their part in a s maller but significant manner. 7. Discussion It can be inferred fro m the above results that infertility affects the level of marital satisfaction and wo men are mo re worried about their infertility compared to their male counterparts. The fact that infertile wo men leads a less satisfied marital life has been supported by similar studies . Indian ma rriage is a socia l process and it reaches a significant stage with the arrival of a child at home. Even today in rural India a childless woman is stigmat ized, considered unlucky and a curse to the family. Many cultures have a derogatory and discriminating name for childless wo man but the same is not there for infertile men. In Japan an infertile wo man is denoted as umazume, and in Korea she is referred to as a suknyu, both these names give the same International Journal of Applied Psychology 2013, 3(3): 31-37 35 mean ing of ‘a wo man made o f stone’. A Vietnamese infert ile wo man is called as gai doc khon con, which means the poison woman without children. Similarly in Tamil, a south Indian language, a childless wo man is called as ‘Malady’ which means impotent woman. A Malady is discriminated to the extent of not being allowed to participate in family ceremonies and social gatherings especially to those involving marriage and childbirth. India being a pronatalist society, most of the Indian wo men few months into their marriage are constantly obsessed about their childbearing status so that they can face the society positively. Whereas as men, though affected by infertility, handle the situation better as the social stigma is pointed only at the wo men. More so, this happens by attributing the reason for infert ility onto the woman/wife and this attitude is reflected by showing resistance to offer themselves for in fertility testing. Although infertility affects men and wo men, researchers had found certain gender differences. Petokexp licated that men do not have monthly menstrual periods like wo men and more o ften men are reviewed for infertility after the wife is found to be fertile. It was also argued that the diagnostic procedures are complex and more invasive for wo men than men. Another exp lanation could be that med ia are not vociferous or visible on fathering as they are on mothering and only a few men’s magazines focus on fathering. In addition, the cultural expectation is that it is man liness to be strong and emotionally detached than to show symptoms of sadness and desperateness. India is a patriarchal society and producing a child, a son brings a lot of happiness in the family and the preference for a son continues to be a prevalent norm in the traditional Indian household.The preference for son is evident in about one million female fet icides in India annually with far-ranging and tragic consequences which has resulted in some areas declining the sex rat io of females to males to less than 8000:1000. As reported in the study, one of the main justifications for this brutality is that while sons offer security to their families in old age and can perform the rites for the souls of deceased parents and ancestors, daughters are perceived as a social and economic burden. Motherhood is of great social significance in India and several studies exp loring the infertility among men report that men perceive it as threat to the continuance of the family heir and lineage. Similar Studies in India have shown that men tend to hold their wives responsible for in fertility and many wives tend to blame themselves for childlessness irrespective of who may be responsible. Also, in some cases wo men are threatened with another marriage for the husband or divorce and many fear abandonment and loss of social and economic security. In such context wo men beco me the victims o f vio lence, abuse and social e xc lusion. The role of emotionality and resilience has been justified in this study. Their role in determining marital satisfaction may be considered as a moderator in handling the hopeless situation of childlessness. Schute et.al examined link between emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations and found that, those who scored high on emotional intelligence showed qualities such as empathy, high on social skills, co-operative attitude toward partners, had a close loving relationships and a greater satisfaction with their partners. Another study conducted on Indian couples indicated a significant positive relationship between emotional intelligence and marital satisfaction.One greater benefit of emotionally intelligent couples is that there is a greater deal of co mmun ication and sensitivity to other’s needs. It also reflects on their o wn self-awareness and acceptance.The emotional forces between husband and wife are much more crucial forces than any other factors and the rifts in family life will be more likely to develop if one or both the partners have deficit in emot ional intelligence. Perception of emotion is part of emotional intelligence so it is reasonable to conclude that higher EI will lead to greater relationship satisfaction in couples, whereas lower EI will result in d issatisfaction in relationship and conflict. Fitness hypothesized that higher EI might lead to handle delicate emotional negotiations involved in seeking and granting forgiveness and therefore, higher EI may lead to better management of disagreements, which in turn means less conflict and mo re relationship satisfaction. Resilience may help married couples to consciously undermine the specific and evident issues of life and consider the larger p icture of mutual respect and togetherness. In the context of marriage, it is very likely that partners enter grave areas of argument and if not for resilience, the overwhelming grudges and ill feelings may lead to a marital discord of serious imp lications Resilience helps to bounce back positively fro m any deadlock or intense and cold situations in one’s married life. This positive attitude helps in maintain ing the focus on the problem and not blaming the partner. Marriage is a very special bond worth fighting for and resilience is possibly the most effective weapon that could be employed for the same. Present study adds support to previous findings on the ro le of resilience in marital quality. Studies conducted to explo re the lin k b et ween family res ilien ce fact o rs an d marit alsatisf action showed a significant positive relationship existed between the family resilience in terms of adaptive appraisal, co mpensating experiences, and social support and midlife marital satisfaction. Thus it is understood that in the face of the develop mental challenges during midlife marriage, higher levels of the factors contributing to family resilience are related to greater levels of mastery of the developmental tasks associated with midlife marital s atis factio n . 8. Conclusions Marital satisfaction is a dynamic concept, as the nature and quality of relat ionships can change drastically when infert ility is involved. This raises the possibility of identifying factors that could make a d ifference to the quality of relat ionship, although such connections are likely to be complex, involving the interactions of many variables 36 D. Barani Ganth et al.: Role of Infertility, Emotional Intelligence and Resilience on M arital Satisfaction among Indian Couples among which gender and infert ility p lays a major ro le followed by resilience and emot ional intelligence. Being an infert ile Indian wo man is certainly disadvantageous when compared to her male counterpart. These results can be used in counseling settings to educate couples on the need for better communication and understanding and the ability to think problem focused than person focused while dealing with issues of infertility. infertility: Gender influence. Holistic Nursing Practice. 7, 44–56.  Adashi, E.Y., Cohen, J., Hamberger, L. et al. (2000) Public perception on infertility and its treatment: an international survey. Human. Reproduction., 15, 330–334.  Lee, T.Y, Sun, G.H, Chao, S.C.(2000).The effect of an infertility diagnosis on the distress, marital and sexual satisfaction between husbands and wives in Taiwan. Human Reproduction 1; 16: 1762-1767. REFERENCES  Roach. A.J., Frazier.P. Larry. Bowden.R.Sharon (1981). The M arital Satisfaction Scale: Development of a M easure for Intervention Research. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 537-546.  T imes of India. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ 20120508/mumbai/31625579 hiv-test-neela-divorce-rate. Accessed on 12/07/2012.  Heaton, T. B., & Blake, A. M . (1999). Gender differences in determinants of marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 25 – 45.  Jejeebhoy, Shireen J.(1998). Infertility in India - levels, patterns and consequences:Priorities for social science research,Journal of Family Welfare, 44(2): 15-24.  Ahmed A.U(1987).Socioeconomic determinants of divorce in Bangladesh. Rural Demography, 14(1-2), 61-77.  Kanani S, Latha K and Shah M (1994). Application of qualitative methodologies to investigate perceptions of women and health practitioners regarding women's health disorders in Baroda slums. In Gittelsohn.J.et.al (Eds), Listening to women talk about their health: Issues and evidence from India, Baroda Citizens Council.  International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC M acro. (2000). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-99; India. M umbai: IIPS.  Census India, 1981. Registrar General, Government of India, New Delhi.  Vemuri, M .D. and M anohar, D.( 1986) .Childlessness in India, Biology and society, 3(4): 163- 166.  Bang RA, Bang AT, Baitule M , Choudhary Y, Sarmukaddam S, Tale O (1989). High prevalence of gynecological diseases in rural Indian women. Lancet. 1:85-87.  Unisa S (1999) Childlessness in Andhra Pradesh, India: treatment seeking and consequences. Reproductive Health Matters 7:54-64.  M ulgaonkar VB (2001) A research and an intervention programme on women's reproductive health in slums of M umbai. M umbai: Sujeevan Trust.  Looking Back, Looking Forward. A Profile of Sexual and Reproductive H ealth in India. http://www.searo.who.int/en/ Section13/Section36/Section1579_6461.htm.Accessed on 12/07/2012.  Phipps, S.A.A. (1993) A phenomenological study of couples'  Andrews, F.M., Abbey, A. and Halman, J. (1991) Stress from infertility, marriage factors, and subjective well-being of wives and husbands. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 32, 238–253.  Nachtigall, R.D., Becker, G. and Wozney, M . (1992). The effects of gender-specific diagnosis on men's and women's response to infertility. Fertility and. Sterility., 57, 113–121.  Berger, D.M . (1980) Impotence following the discovery of azoospermia. Fertility and. Sterility., 34, 154–156.  Lee, T.Y. and Sun, G.H. (2000). Psychosocial response of Chinese infertile husbands and wives. Arch. Androl., 45, 143–148.  Dhaliwal, L.K, Gupta, K.R., Gopalan, S. and Kulhara, P. (2004) Psychological aspects of infertility due to various causes – a prospective study, International Journal of Fertility and Women’s Medicine, 49, 1, 44–8.  Peterson B, Newton C, Rosen K. (2003).Examining congruence between couples’ perceived infertility related stress and its relationship to depression and marital adjustment in infertile men and women. Family Process 2003; 42:59-70.  Durana, Carlos. (1996). A longitudinal evaluation of the effectiveness of the PAIRS psychoeducational program for couples. Family Therapy, 23(1), 11-35.  Noller, P., Beach, S., & Osgarby, S. (1997). Cognitive and affective processes in marriage. In W. K. Halford & H. J. M arkman (Eds.), Clinical handbook of marriage and couples (pp. 43–71). New York: JohnWiley & Sons.  Carton, J. S., Kessler, E. A., & Pape, C. L. (1999).Nonverbal decoding skills and relationship well-being in adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 91–100.  Rusbult, C. E., Bissonnette, V. L., & Arriaga, X. B.(1998). Accommodation processes during the early years of marriage. In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 74–113). New York: Cambridge University Press  Fitzpatricka K. E., Vacha-Haasea T. (2010 ) M arital Satisfaction and Resilience in Caregivers of Spouses with Dementia. Clinical Gerontologist 33(3), 165 - 180  Conger, R. D.; Rueter M . A.; Elder Jr., Glen H.(1999) Couple resilience to economic pressure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 76(1), 54-71. doi: 10.1037 / 0022-35126.96.36.199  Immanuel Thomas and Sushama.S.R.(2003).Emotional Intelligence Inventory, Tiruvananthapuram, University of Kerala.  Annalakshmi, N. (2009). Bharathiar University Resilience International Journal of Applied Psychology 2013, 3(3): 31-37 37 Scale.In Harish Purohit and Ajay Wagh (Eds). Research Methods in Business and Management. New Delhi: Sri Publishers.  Amrithraj B & Prakash I.J (1985):M arital Satisfaction Scale. Psychological Studies, 30(2), 124-126, compiled in Pestonjee, DM (1997): Third Handbook of Psychological & Social Instruments, Vol 1, Concept Publications, New Delhi.  Iyengar K, Iyengar S(1999). Dealing with infertility: experience of a reproductive health programme in southern Rajasthan. National Consultation on Infertility Prevention and M anagement. New Delhi, UNFPA .  Desai, P., V. Shrinivasan and M . Hazra.(1992). Understanding the emotions of infertile couples. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 42: 498-503.  Petok, W. D. (2004). M ale infertility: Family building  Singh, A., L.K. Dhaliwal and A. Kaur. 1996. Infertility in A magazine. Retrieved February 23, 2012, from primary health centre of northern India: A follow up study. ht tp ://www.resolve.org Journal of Family Welfare,42: 51-56.  Callister.,L.N(2006). The Pain and the Promise of Unfilled Dreams: Infertile Couples.In.D.R.Crane &E.S.M arshall(Eds) Handbook of families and Health. (pp 96-112) Sage publications.Thousand Oaks.  Schutte, N.S., M alouff, J.M ., Bobik, C., Conston, T., Greeson, C., Jedlicka, C., Rhodes, E. & Wendorf, G. (2001). Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 523-536  Garg.S.,Nath.A(2008) Female feticide in India: issues and concerns. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 54(4):276-9.  Ahmad.N(2010).Female feticide in India. Issues in Law and Medicine. Summer; 26(1):13-29.  Jindal U.N,Gupta A.N(1989).Social problems of infertile women in India. International Journal of Fertility, 34:0–33.  Singh AJ, Dhaliwal LK (1993) Identification of infertile couples in a rural area of Northern India. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 98:206–208.  Neff D.L(1994). The social construction of infertility: the case of the matrilineal Nayars in South India. Social Science and M edicine, 39:475–485.  Patel, T. 1994. Fertility Behaviour: Population and Society in a Rajasthan Village. Delhi: O xford University Press.  Prakasamma.M (1999). Infertility: a social and gender perspective. National Consultation on Infertility Prevention and M anagement. New Delhi, UNFPA.  Lavalekar. A., Kulkarni.P., Jagtap.P(2010) .Emotional intelligen ce and marital satisfaction. Journal of Psycholog ical Researches , Vol. 5, Number. 2, 185-194.  Fitness, J. (1991). Emotional intelligence and intimate relationships. In J. Ciarrochi, J. P. Forgas, & J. D. M ayer (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in everyday life (pp. 98–112). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.  Huber, Charles H. et al. (2010, M arch 9). Family Resilience and M idlife M arital Satisfaction. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 18(2), 136-145  Rutter, M . (1999). Resilience concepts and findings: Implications for family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 119–144  Batool, S. S., & Khalid, R. (2009b). Role of emotional intelligence in marital relationship. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 24(1-2), 43-62.
... pages left unread,continue reading
Free reading is over, click to pay to read the rest ... pages
0 dollars，0 people have bought.
Reading is over. You can download the document and read it offline
0people have downloaded it