eduzhai > Helth Sciences > Pharmaceutical >

The role of vasopressin in defining interstitial ectopic pregnancy during laparoscopic surgery

  • sky
  • (0) Download
  • 20211101
  • Save
https://www.eduzhai.net American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 2021, 11(7): 518-523 DOI: 10.5923/j.ajmms.20211107.04 Place of Vasopressin in Demarcation of Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancies During Laparoscopic Resection Samarawickrama N. G. C. L. Senior Registrar, Professorial Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka Abstract Background: Diagnosis and management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy is challenging. Resistance of decidual vessels to vasopressin when compared to rest of the uterine vasculature taken into consideration in laparoscopic excision of interstitial ectopic pregnancies to demarcate the margins and to minimize blood loss. Method: Case series of nine patients diagnosed with interstitial ectopic, who underwent laparoscopic surgery, were injected with diluted vasopressin to the myometrium prior to make the surgical resection. Results: The myometrial tissue turned pale in contrast to pink and vascular interstitial ectopic revealing a clear margin between the two tissues. Vasopressin injection significantly reduced the blood loss as oppose to procedure done without vasopressin. Conclusion: Injection of vasopressin in to the myometrium prior to resection of an interstitial ectopic pregnancy provides well-demarcated zones to aid complete laparoscopic resection while minimizing the blood loss. Keywords Interstitial ectopic, Vasopressin, Laparoscopic 1. Introduction When the conception implanted outside the uterine cavity it is referred to as an ectopic pregnancy regardless of the site of implantation [1]. The incidence of an ectopic pregnancy is 11 per 1000 pregnancies at present and it is being in increasing trend over the recent years [1,2]. Even though majority of these women does not carry any risk factors, tubal damages due to infections, pelvic surgeries, smoking and artificial reproductive techniques are direct contributory factors for these abnormal implantations. Fallopian tubes are the commonest site for abnormal implantations, which accountable for 95% of extra uterine pregnancies and among these, 80% are in the ampulla region of the tube [3]. Trans vaginal scan is the diagnostic tool of choice in diagnosing an ectopic pregnancy, with the sensitivity of 87 to 99% and specificity of 94 to 99% [1] in the light of clinical and biochemical findings. When an ectopic pregnancy implanted in the interstitial part of the tube, this abnormal implantation is referred to as an interstitial ectopic, with the incidence of 1% to 6% [1]. This part of the fallopian tube is about 1 to 2 cm in length and is encircled by a thin layer of myometrium. Three- dimensional ultrasonography will increase the sensitivity of detecting an interstitial ectopic pregnancy when compared to the conventional two- dimensional ultrasonography [1]. Comparatively interstitial ectopic * Corresponding author: clslalithcls@gmail.com (Samarawickrama N. G. C. L.) Received: Jun. 20, 2021; Accepted: Jun. 30, 2021; Published: Jul. 15, 2021 Published online at https://www.eduzhai.net pregnancies are associated with higher morbidity and mortality due to its inherent difficulty in the diagnosis, which leads to delayed diagnosis with higher chance of uterine rupture and subsequent significant life-threatening hemorrhage. The established criterion in diagnosing an interstitial ectopic pregnancy includes (1) Empty uterine cavity (2) Laterally placed gestational sac surrounded by less than 5 mm myometrial tissues (3) Presence of “interstitial line sign” [1] (Figure 1). It has been noted that rather delayed risk for rupture due to the presence of myometrial covering, interstitial ectopic pregnancies rupture in early gestations than expected [4]. Figure 1. Trans abdominal ultrasound image showing an interstitial pregnancy at 12 weeks and 5 days. Arrows indicate normal endometrium on the left and absent myometrium above the pregnancy All accepted methods of management could be applied American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 2021, 11(7): 518-523 519 in the management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies, which include conservative management (expectant and pharmacological with methotrexate) and surgical excision [1]. But it is important to highlight that the choice between the types of management depend on clinical presentation, biochemical and ultrasonic findings as well as the age and fertility wishes of the woman. An asymptomatic woman presents at early gestation, in the absence of clinical instability with low levels of serum b-human chorionic gonadotropin (b-hCG), can be considered as a candidate for the conservative management [5]. In both expectant and medical management, it is important to have a regular and timed ultrasound surveillance along with the evaluation of serum b-hCG levels. But it is important to highlight the fact that, these methods associated with significantly higher number of controversies due to higher failure rates. Surgical approach is the main stay of treatment in the management of interstitial pregnancies, which includes open laparotomy, laparoscopic approach or Hysteroscopic resection under laparoscopic guidance [1]. Open laparotomy may be the preferred route in the clinical picture of hemodynamic instability following ruptured ectopic pregnancy. But for patients who are hemodynamically stable, laparoscopic cornual resection or cornuostomy would be the preferred method due to its inherent minimal access nature. All the advantages of a laparoscopic surgery, which include minimal access nature, minimal postoperative morbidity and rapid recovery with higher patient satisfaction [6], are applied in this setup. Even though there are some case reports available for Hysteroscopic approach in the management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies, at present this approach utilized less frequently [7]. 2. Objectives Due to the anatomical site, interstitial ectopic pregnancies are associated with an increased risk of life-threatening hemorrhages following rupture as well as during surgical resections. Compared to open methods, laparoscopic approach associated with higher incidences of intra-operative hemorrhages, thus there are many techniques developed to minimize such bleeding. These include infiltration of diluted vasopressin to the normal uterine myometrium, electrocoagulation of resected area, multi-layered repair of surgical defect and ligation of ipsilateral uterine artery [8]. In the literature of laparoscopic management of interstitial pregnancies, the use of diluted Vasopressin in view of minimizing the hemorrhage has being well established [8]. But it is important to highlight the fact that in certain interstitial ectopic pregnancies, it is not straightforward in demarcating these resection margins. As one of the premier centers for advanced laparoscopic surgeries in Sri Lanka, the Professorial Obstetrics and Gynecology unit attached to Colombo South Teaching Hospital, we looked into this fact more closely as it can improve both patient care as well as the training of postgraduate trainees. We have observed that in addition to minimizing the risk of intra-operative hemorrhages, injection of Vasopressin can be used as a method of demarcating the interstitial ectopic thus to perform more organized resection. Our objective in this article is to delineate the importance of proper demarcation by explaining the anatomical, molecular and receptor level interactions of vasopressin with uterine and trophoblastic tissues. Vasopressin - Mechanism of action Vasopressin is a typical neural hormone (Nona peptide) which secreted by the neural cells in the hypothalamus [9]. Its primary action is to enhance water re-absorption at the nephron levels in the kidney via the action at V2 receptor level. When the hormone acts on V1 receptor it activates the cascade of intracellular signal transduction via IP3 (Inositol Triphosphate) in the vascular smooth muscles thus cause vasoconstriction [10]. This effect is the basis for injecting vasopressin to the uterine myometrium to minimize bleeding during procedures such as myomectomy and cornual resection of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. As mentioned previously, for the action of vasopressin, presence of vascular smooth muscle is an essential factor. Therefore, this knowledge can be utilized in view of demarcating the gestational trophoblastic tissues from the uterine myometrium. Myometrium, Placenta and Fetomaternal interface – The difference in the vasculature By the beginning of the 3rd week, the trophoblasts are characterized by the presence of primary villi, that consist of cytotrophoblast core covered by a syncytial layer [3]. During further development, mesodermal cells penetrate the core of the primary villi and grow towards the decidua thus form the secondary villi. By the end of third week, mesodermal cells in the core of the villus begin to differentiate in to blood vessels and small blood cells and therefore differentiate into a tertiary villus. During further trophoblastic differentiation along with trophoblastic invasion of terminal branches of maternal spiral arteries, hybrid vessels containing both fetal and maternal cells are replaced by an endothelium. To accomplish this process, cytotrophoblast cells undergo an epithelial to endothelial transition, along with transformation of decidual spiral arteries from small-caliber resistance vessels to large, capacitate, low resistance vessels, which lack smooth muscle coat [3,11]. Absence of smooth muscle cells allows these vascular lakes to be resistant to vasoconstrictor substances such as vasopressin thus maintain constant supply of adequate amount of blood to the growing fetus. This is the chemistry behind well demarcation of interstitial ectopic pregnancy following vasopressin injection into the myometrium. This knowledge can be applied for the comprehensive resection of interstitial ectopic pregnancy along with proper repair of uterine defect. Additionally, this type of approach can reduce the incidence of uterine 520 Samarawickrama N. G. C. L.: Place of Vasopressin in Demarcation of Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancies During Laparoscopic Resection ruptures during subsequent pregnancies [12], a wellrecognized complication of cornual resection and repair. 3. Our Experience In our unit as one of the premier centers for advanced laparoscopic surgeries in Sri Lanka, unless otherwise indicated, almost all ectopic pregnancies were managed via laparoscopic approach. Wide variety of surgical approaches have been utilized depend on the type and clinical presentation of the ectopic pregnancy. For the interstitial ectopic pregnancies, either cornual resection or cornuostomy and anatomical reconstruction are the preferred methods. Up to date our unit has the highest number of case reports with regard to laparoscopic management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies in Sri Lanka and all these cases are pre mapped by using vasopressin injection (Table 1). In the literature of cornual ectopic pregnancy, a technique of using highly diluted vasopressin (20 Units of vasopressin diluted in 1000 ml of normal saline and injected 150–250 ml below the interstitial pregnancy to achieve hemostasis during laparoscopic surgery has been described [13]. In our practice we inject 20 Units of vasopressin, which diluted in 200 ml of normal saline into the uterine myometrium. The aim of this technique is to achieve maximum trophoblastic to myometrial demarcation in addition to achieving bloodless field for the laparoscopic resection. Careful patient selection is an essential component as patients with certain medical conditions such as seizure disorders, migraine headache, asthma, cardiovascular or renal disease, heart failure, goiter with cardiac complications, arteriosclerosis, or fluid overload are not suitable for vasopressin injection [14]. 4. Case Reports The images shown below are of some patients who managed laparoscopically following vasopressin injection in Colombo South Teaching Hospital University Gynecology unit attached to University of Sri Jayewardenepura. The mean gestation age is nine weeks for this case series with mean gestational sac diameter of 38 mm. Case description 1 Figure 2. Laparoscopic view of large right interstitial ectopic pregnancy in case 1 Table 1. Summary of reported cases of laparoscopic treatment of cornual pregnancy Patient ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Surgery Cornual resection Cornual resection Cornual resection Cornual resection Cornual resection Cornual resection Cornual resection Cornual resection Cornual resection hCG Level (mIU/ml) 4800 2300 2400 3100 4100 2400 4600 5700 7100 Diameter (mm) 28 25 26 26 32 21 34 34 31 Rupture No No No No No No No No No Vasopressin Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Figure 3. Laparoscopic view of right interstitial ectopic pregnancy after injection of diluted vasopressin in case 1 Figure 4. Laparoscopic cornual resection after injection vasopressin in case 1 American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 2021, 11(7): 518-523 521 Figure 5. Laparoscopic cornual resection and repair of right interstitial ectopic pregnancy in case 1 A 31-year-old woman, G3P1C1 presented to the Gynecological ward of Colombo South Teaching Hospital with a history of period of amenorrhea. According to her last menstrual period, the estimated gestational age was ten weeks and four days. She complained of non-radiating, dull lower abdominal pain, which accompanied with bleeding per vagina. Her first pregnancy was in 2012, ended with vaginal delivery at term following Prostaglandin E2 induction and delivered a live male baby. The second pregnancy ended as a spontaneous miscarriage at six weeks of gestation in 2013 for which she underwent medical management. On general examination, patient was not pale. The pulse rate was 78 beats per minute and her blood pressure was 110/70 mmHg. The abdomen was not distended, and mild tenderness was elicited in the right iliac fossa with no guarding. Pelvic examination revealed normal external genitalia, closed cervix and positive cervical motion tenderness. The uterus was bulky, tender and examining finger was stained with blood. Patient had a positive urine pregnancy test. Trans vaginal 2 - dimensional ultrasound scan revealed an empty uterus with thickened endometrium of 12 millimeters. There was a circumscribed well- encapsulated mass measuring 39 x 41 mm, eccentrically positioned at the upper portion of the uterus away from the lateral edge of the uterine cavity with no fetal pole. No free fluid collection was demonstrated in the pouch of Douglas. The diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy was made, and laparoscopic resection was planned. The intra operatively there was a clean abdomino-pelvic cavity with slightly bulky uterus. The right cornua was distended by a mass of 55 mm in length (Figure 2). Both ovaries and left tube were normal. Following vasopressin injection, normal uterine tissue became totally pale compared to the ectopic pregnancy with a distinct demarcation between the two regions (Figure 3). Patient underwent right Cornual resection and salpingectomy (Figure 4). The tissue defect was repaired laparoscopically by using 0 variable loop braided sutures (Figure 5). Histopathological evaluation of the specimen confirmed the diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day 2 post-operatively. Case description 2 A 28-year-old G2P0C0 presented with a history of seven weeks of period of amenorrhea and positive urinary hCG test. Her first pregnancy was a missed miscarriage at 10 weeks of gestation and was managed medically. She had mild non-specific right side lower abdominal pain, which was worsening over the last one week. On clinical examination patient is not pale, and hemodynamically stable. Other than mild right-side tenderness, the abdominal examination is unremarkable. Vaginal examination revealed mild right adnexal tenderness with some cervical motion tenderness. Trans vaginal scan revealed a right side 35 X 45 mm extra uterine pregnancy without an embryo. The diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy was made and proceeds in to a laparoscopic cornuostomy and tubal reconstruction. Prior to the surgery uterine injection of vasopressin was performed where the demarcation between normal uterine tissue and trophoblastic tissue was evident as shown in Figure 6. Figure 6. Right interstitial ectopic pregnancy after injection of diluted vasopressin in case 2 Case description 3 35-year-old G4P3C3 with three previous vaginal deliveries at term presented with a history of nine- week period of amenorrhea and positive urinary hCG test. She had mild non-specific right side lower abdominal pain, which aggravated with movements. Patient was hemodynamically stable with unremarkable abdominal and vaginal examination findings. Trans vaginal scan revealed a right side 25 X 30 mm gestational sac, which located more toward right cornu of the uterus. Additionally, there were several small intramural and sub serosal fibroids noted. The diagnosis of right side interstitial ectopic pregnancy was made and proceeds in to a laparoscopic cornual resection along with bilateral salpingectomy as the patient does not have further fertility wishes. Prior to the surgery uterine injection of vasopressin was 522 Samarawickrama N. G. C. L.: Place of Vasopressin in Demarcation of Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancies During Laparoscopic Resection performed where the demarcation between normal uterine tissue and trophoblastic tissue was evident as shown in Figure 7. Proper dissection provides optimal repair of the uterine defect thus minimize the risk of uterine rupture following subsequent pregnancies [12]. These cases illustrate the degree of clarity in demarcation of interstitial ectopic pregnancies by injection of Vasopressin therefore will continue to be benefited to both individual patients as well as the health care system. REFERENCES Figure 7. Right interstitial ectopic pregnancy after injection of diluted vasopressin in case 3 5. Discussion Laparoscopic management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies has been described extensively in the literature [15,16]. Compared to other locations of ectopic pregnancies, presence of an interstitial ectopic pregnancy, carries a significantly increased risk of severe morbidity and mortality. This consist of intra-operative adverse outcomes including heavy and often life-threatening bleeding due to the challenging nature of these surgical procedures [8]. Thus, findings successful methods to identify these pregnancies early and establishing ways to minimize the risk associated with the procedure would improve overall surgical outcomes. The use of vasopressin injection to minimize the bleeding risk during resection of interstitial ectopic pregnancies has being described by many case series [8,13]. But in the same literature, we have observed that the use of Vasopressin for the demarcation of interstitial ectopic pregnancies has being seldom addressed. Due to the anatomical location of the interstitial ectopic, surgical management either open or laparoscopic is always challenging. Thus, proper demarcation of the gestational trophoblastic tissues from normal uterine tissues will provide excellent field of resection to the operator. As it has being described earlier, the difference between the vasculature provides the key to this explanation. Depend on the presence or absence of Vasopressin V1 receptors, the vasculature responds to the vasoactive Vasopressin. Since normal uterine vasculature consists of vessels that are capable of contracting in response to Vasopressin, it will become a distinctly pale zone. Therefore, this area stands as a well-demarcated area from gestational tissues, which remain in the normal tissue texture throughout. This demarcation of zones will provide better tissue resection plane during surgical management of the ectopic pregnancy not only for an experienced operator, for whom who are in the process of acquiring the experience and skills. [1] Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Green Top Guideline No. 21, RCOG Press: London, November 2016. Available at http://www.rcog.org.uk/gtg 21 (Accessed on 26 September 2017). [2] O’Herlihy C; Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries. Deaths in early pregnancy. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011; 118 Suppl 1: 81– 4. [3] Sadler TW. Langmann’s Medical Embryology. Twelfth edition, Vol 1: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2011; 2: 13. [4] Tulandi T, Al-Jaroudi D. Interstitial pregnancy: results generated from the Society of Reproductive Surgeons Registry. Ob- stet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 47– 50. [5] Poon LC, Emmanuel E, Ross JA, Johns J. How feasible is expectant management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 317–21. [6] Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (3): CD003677. [7] Katz DL, Barrett JP, Sanfilippo JS, Badway DM. Combined hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in the treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1113–4. [8] Moawad NS, Mahajan ST, Moniz MH, Taylor SE, Hurd WW. Current diagnosis and treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 15–29. [9] Kim E Barrett, Susan M Barman, Scott Boitano, Hedwen L Brooks; Ganong’s review of medical physiology. 24th edition, McGraw-Hill Companies. 2012. [10] Den Ouden, DT and Meinders, AE. Vasopressin: physiology and clinical use in patients with vasodilatory shock: a review. The Netherlands Journal of Medicine 63: 4-13, 2005. [11] Vinay K, Abul K. Abbas, Jon C. Aster. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. 2015; 1038. [12] Parker WH, Einarsson J, Istre O, Dubuisson J. Risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Inva- sive Gynecol. 2010; 17: 551–554. [13] Moon HS, Kim SG, Park GS, Choi JK, Koo JS, Joo BS. Efficacy of bleeding control using a large amount of highly diluted vasopressin in laparoscopic treatment for interstitial American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 2021, 11(7): 518-523 523 pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 30.e1–6. [14] Berl T: Vasopressin antagonists. N Engl J Med 372: 2207–2216, 2015. [15] Warda H, Mamik M, Ashraf M, Abuzeid M. Interstitial ectopic pregnancy: conservative surgical management. JSLS. 2014; 18: 197–203. [16] Ng S, Hamontri S, Chua I, Chern B, Siow A. Laparoscopic management of 53 cases of cornual ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 448–452. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

... pages left unread,continue reading

Document pages: 6 pages

Please select stars to rate!

         

0 comments Sign in to leave a comment.

    Data loading, please wait...
×