eduzhai > Helth Sciences > Nursing >

A study on the incidence of lower back pain among theater nurses: a case study of the teaching hospitals of ilolin University and Obafemi University

  • sky
  • (0) Download
  • 20211031
  • Save
https://www.eduzhai.net International Journal of Nursing Science 2012, 2(3): 23-28 DOI: 10.5923/j.nursing.20120203.02 The Incidence of Low Back Pain among Theatre Nurses: A Case Study of University of Ilorin and Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Christiana D. Hinmikaiye1, Eunice I. Bamishaiye2,* 1Nursing department, perioperating unit, University, Ilorin, Niger ia 2Biochemistry units, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute, Kano, Nigeria Abstract Studies have shown that low back pain is common and accounts for a large nu mber of reported disabilit ies among nurses who also happen to have one of the h ighest levels of back injury in all occupation groups.The aim of the current study was to determine the incidences of lo w back pain among theatre nurses in university of Ilorin and Obafemi Awo lowo university Teaching hospitals. A structured questionnaire was the tool of data collection. The study population and sample included all theatre nurses in all the theatre related sections. A total of 80 nurses participated in the study. The first set requested socio-demographic data, fo llo wed by the Nord ic Musculoskeletal Disorder Questionnaire which examined lo w back pain prevalence. A response rate of 91% was obtained. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the demographic data of the study sample, wh ich were presented using frequency tables and expressed as percentages, means and standard deviations. 57 (78.1%) respondents experienced the first episode of back pain after co mmencing nursing, mo re females (70%) than males (30%) were employed. It can be seen that about 44 out of 57 subjects who had experienced back pain in their career experienced it at least once a month or more frequently. 64.91% subjects rated their pain as moderate pa in. The largest single category was 'low back', with 77.19% o f the 57 analyzable responses. 34 respondents said they Lift patient within bed without assistance.The high incidence of back pain is brought about by factors which seem to be entirely preventable. It is apparent that nurses are taking risks or are pursuing questionable practices.It was therefore concluded that the prevalence rate of 78.1% is high and efforts should be made by the nurses, ministry of health and the country at large on how to reduce the prevalence rate. Keywords Nurse, Pain, Back, Operating Roo m 1. Introduction International Association for the Study of Pain defined pain as an unpleasantsensory and emotionalexperience associated with actual or potential tissuedamage, or described in terms of such damage. It is a major sympto m in many medical conditions, and can significantly interfere with a person's quality of life and general functioning [1]. An operating room nurse als o known as theatre nurs e or a p eriop erat iv e nu rs e is a h ealth care wo rker who is a professionally registered nurse that assists the surgeon and the surgical team in their tasks. They are responsible fo r the supply o f all of th e su rg ical needs and fo r keep ing of inventory of all of the various items that were used during the operation. They also tend to the health and care of the patient in the operating roo m, oversee the work organization within * Corresponding author: bamishaiyeeunice@yahoo.com (Eunice I. Bamishaiye) Published online at https://www.eduzhai.net Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved the operating theatre, and mediate between the various hospitals, departments, the surgeons, and the management [2]. In the past decades, there has been increasing interest in occupational health issues relating to musculoskeletal system. One of these is low back pain (LBP), a phenomenon with particularly high prevalence all over the world[3-4]. Low back pain is not only considered to be the most co mmon reason for functional disability, worldwide, but also estimated to affect almost 90% o f the universal population[5]. Moreover, low back pain is said to be among the leading musculoskeletal disorders that predominantly affect the working population in developed as well as in developing co u n tries [6]. Jansen J., Burdorf A. and Steyerberg E., (2001)[7] reported that LBP is a social problem due to the negative impact in daily/professional life, cost and mental/physical health. Researchers report that 65-80% of general population will have at least one LBP inc ident during adulthood[8]. According to the results of studies carried out in the United States, lower back pain is the most frequent reason 24 Christiana D. Hinmikaiye et al.: The Incidence of Low Back Pain among Theatre Nurses: A Case Study of University of Ilorin and Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital for temporary disability among the population at large in the age group under 45, and in persons aged 45-56, it is the third most frequent reason leading to the restriction of physical activity of individuals having suffered heart trouble and rheumatic diseases[9]. Nurses, as professionals, have serious incidents of occupational LBP and trau mas in the lu mbar area, as their profession is unique with heavy e motional and physical work, and are exposed to a co mbination of mechanical and psychosocial stress at work[10-11]. Working positions often are uncomfortable either due to lack of space or movement restriction caused by special circu mstances, such as in dialysis unit, operating theatre, intensive care unit. It has been found that nurses have to walk and stand up during their shift more than warehouse workers a lot of times more than 6 hours a day[12]. Seventy two percent (72%) of Korean hospital nurses experienced low back pain and nurses who reported manual handling of patients were 7,2 times mo re likely to report musculoskeletal sympto ms[13]. The prevalence of back disorders among nursing staff was found to be 36% and 63% in the Netherlands and Cape Town (South Africa) respectively[14].[15] found that physical variables which seem to elicit symptoms of lo w back pain in subjects the most, were lifting (65%), and wo rking in awkward postures (47%), stooping (34%) and poor ergonomic layout of the ward (53%).[16] also found out that the prevalence of low back pain was 87% in ICU nurses and 64% in nurses working in other wards in a Ch inese hospital study involving 4 077 emp loyees. The co mpressive force on the disc between the L5 and S1 vertebrae was calculated with Bless Pro software and was seen to be the highest during observation of drainage, lift ing and transferring of patients in bed, injection and suctioning[16]. In Greece, in a study carried out by[17] with 407 female nurses at a major Athens hospital, the researchers showed that prevalence was 63% and 67% for time periods of two weeks and six months respectively Several h igh risk activit ies have been identified for nurses in the hospital especially in relation to low back pain. The most important factor related to work load is rapid movement co mbined with poor body posture especially when nurses perform their duties under t ime pressure. Time pressure activities include emergency nursing care, operating rooms, unplanned or une xpected work within hospital units. It is generally accepted that nursing staff belong to the group of high-risk pro fessions with regard to the occurrence of musculoskeletal in juries and Data on the prevalence of LBP among operating roo m nurses is not much and considering their significance in nursing system, mo re information and knowledge needs to be disseminated therefore the statement of the problem is to investigate into the causes, effects and incidence of lower back pain (LBP) among theater nurses in University of Ilorin and Obafemi Awolo wo Teaching hospital. 2. Methodology 2.1. Study Area The study was conducted at University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH) and Obafemi Awo lowo University Teaching Hospital (OAUTH), Nigeria. The hospitals are one of the referral hospitals in Ilorin and Ile-Ife City respectively. The population for the study included all the operating room nurses of both University teaching hospitals. 2.2. Instrument The instrument for the study is a simp le rating structured questionnaire tagged ‘Low back pain among theatre nurses. The first section of the questionnaire assessed the following socio-demographic characteristics of the nurses: gender, age, marital status and working experience wh ile the second, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Disorder Questionnaire was completed to evaluate the prevalence of low back pain of the participant. 2.3. Admi nistrati on of the Instrument The study population and sample included all theater nurses in the main theater and accident and emergency unit. A total of 88 theater nurses are work in the two hospitals however, only 80 were considered for the study as 8 were on annual leave. All the 80 were willing to participate. Considering the ethical measures, participation in the study was voluntary so participants had a choice to be part of the study or refrain without giving any reason. 2.4. Data Analysis Co mpleted data was captured on a spreadsheet using the Word Exce l progra mme in preparation for analysis. The data were recorded fro m question responses into meaningful prevalence variables. Double data entering was done to ensure data quality. Thereafter data was transferred into the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. Descriptive statistics was employed to summarize the demographic data of the study sample. The demographic data was presented using frequency tables and expressed as percentages, means and standard deviations. 3. Results and Discussion A total of 88 questionnaires were distributed among theatre nurses from UITH A ND OA UTH, and 80 were fully completed and returned, y ield ing a response rate of 91%. The reasons for non-participation in the study included not being available as a result of leave, absence from work and also refusal to participate. Increasing age has been associated with an increase in musculoskeletal sy mptoms. However, it has been stated that low back pain usually begins in early life, with highest frequency of symptoms occurring in the age range of 35 to 55[18]. Th is is in agreement with this research work which shows that the theatre nurses who suffer LBP most (45%) a re between age ranges of 41-50 as seen in Table 1. According International Journal of Nursing Science 2012, 2(3): 23-28 25 to[19], the prevalence of low back pain increases with age and[20] adds that economic productivity decreases with age. The vast majority of operat ing roo m nursing staff was female in this study (70%) as shown in Table 1 and low back pain in this occupational group was also much higher than the general point prevalence of low back pain found in this s tud y . Table 1. Socio- Demographic Factors and their Relationship to the Presence of Low Back Pain Paramete r Age 21-30 years 31-40 years 41-50 years 51-60 years Gen der Male Female Marital status Single Married Divorced Widowed Sep arat ed Reli gion Ch rist ian ity Islam Traditional worshipper Ye ar range 1-5 years 6-11 years 12-17 years 18- 23 years 24-29 years 30-35 years Frequency 4 8 18 10 24 56 12 58 6 2 2 56 24 - 5 15 17 21 12 10 P ercent age 10 20 45 25 30 70 15 72.5 7.5 2.5 2.5 70 30 - 6.25 18.75 21.25 26.25 15 12.5 A study carried out to determine the prevalence and actors of lo w back pain among hospital staff in Tunisia, found that being a female nurse was significantly associated to low back pain occurrence[21]. Mwilila[22], in her study carried out in one of Tanzan ia’s hospitals also reported that 83.6% of the total study population was made up of fema le nurses who also had the highest low back pain prevalence as co mpared to their male colleagues. Valid Yes No Tot al Table 2. Prevalence of back pain Frequency 57 16 73 Percentage (%) 78.1 21.9 100 The findings of this survey demonstrated a high prevalence of back pain as shown in Table 2 (78.1%) compared with other international findings which demonstrated a prevalence of back pain that ranged fro m 43%to 79% [23]. Several researches on back pain among nurses found prevalence of back pain varying between 45%58%[24]. A study conducted among nurses from two selected hospitals in Nigeria and Ethiopia revealed one year low back pain prevalence of 71%[25]. M wilila[22] also reported a low back pain prevalence of 73.7% among nurses fro m one of Tanzania’s major hospitals. Although these results are slightly lower than the current study results (78%), they may be co mparab le. In the same context, a survey conducted to determine the prevalence of occupational low back pain among hospital workers and the general population in one of Nigeria’s districts, nurses reported a higher prevalence of low back pain (69%) over secretaries and admin istrative workers[26]. Similarly,[27] in their study carried out among nurses in Nigeria conclude that low back pain is co mmon among health care wo rkers, and nurses who make almost 33% of all hospital staff were found to have greater chances of work related in juries (60%). Most respondents claimed the commonest site to develop back pain was at the lo wer back area 77.19% as shown in Table 3 below. Th is could be due to lu mbar region received the highest pressure when a person manually lifting weight[28] Table 3. Usual Site of Back Pain Upper back and neck Mid back Low back Butt ocks and legs Total subjects 57 57 57 57 Yes (percent) 20 (35.09%) 11(19.30%) 44(77.19%) 12(21.05%) No (percent) 37(64.91%) 46(80.70%) 13(22.81%) 45(78.95%) When comparing theater nursing experience of ‘2 to less than 5 years’, and ‘above 8 years’, the results showed an increase in the percentage of back pain fro m 29.83% to 47.37%(respectively) with an increase in working years as shown in Table 4. It is expected that this ratio would be low as experienced nurses are supposed to be more experienced in performing caring activities. It is still uncertain if the reason behind this finding is related to increased workload on Operating room nurses or other factors (aging, for e xa mple ). Table 4. Back Pain and Years of Experience in Nursing Below 2 yrs 2 to less than 5 yrs 5 to 8 yrs Above 8 yrs Tot al Frequency 4 17 9 27 57 Percentage (%) 7.02 29.83 15.78 47.37 100 It can be seen that about 44 out of 57 subjects who had experienced back pain in their career experienced it at least once a month or more frequently as seen in Table 5 below. Frequent pain reduces work input wh ich may have a negative effect on the personality of the staff and patients. Acute pain serves as a warning that something somewhere in the body is amiss and requires immediate attention, whereas chronic pain might never fu lly cease[29]. When pain lasts for 6 months or more in periodic or unremitting episodes, it can be defined as chronic in nature. This find ing puts more light on the physical and 26 Christiana D. Hinmikaiye et al.: The Incidence of Low Back Pain among Theatre Nurses: A Case Study of University of Ilorin and Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital psychological impact of back pain on nurses in general. Depression usually acco mpanies chronic pain, and this has an adverse effect on the nurses’ morale and job performance [29]. Table 5. Frequency of Back Pain Daily Once a week Once a month A fewtimes a year once a year Tot al Frequency 8 22 14 10 3 57 P ercent age 14.04 38.60 24.56 17.54 5.26 100 Findings regarding report ing back pain to the administrative body were also imp ressive. Only 61.76% of the respondents reported their back pain to senior administrative, which supports the common finding that nurses tend to ignore complaining of back pain[30]. The finding that 77.193% of the back pain sufferers were experiencing lower back pain is not surprising given that the lower back is the most susceptible site and they stand on their feet for a very long time. The lower lu mbar discs, L4– L5 and L5–S1, are subject to the greatest mechanical stress, compression force and the greatest degenerative changes. These compression forces are generated by heavy physical work, manual lifting and prolonged static work posture. There is other evidence that inappropriate pract ices are taking place. Given that ‘transferring the patient’ was the top dynamic factor as seen in Tab le 6 contributing to the back pain and that ‘lift ing a heavy patient within the bed without assistance’ came close second, there is some indication that suitable techniques for lift ing and carrying are not being adopted in practice. Table 6. Number of subjects who reported the following dynamic factors contributing to their back pain (n= 57) Fact ors Lifting patient within bed with assist an ce Lifting patient within bed without assist an ce Lifting patient from floor with assist an ce Lifting patient from floor without assist an ce Transferring patient (bed to chair; bed to bed Don’t know Number of responses 28 34 29 21 40 12 The second most common finding that ‘lifting a patient without assistance’ contributed to most nurses’ back pain indicates that nurses are taking risks either necessarily or unnecessarily. If they are taking risks unnecessarily then they are guilty of neglect which puts themselves and the patient at risk of injury. If it is necessarily incurred because of staff shortages then the health service management is putting nurses and patients at risk of inju ry. Tissue resistant during manual heavy lift ing differs between indiv idual persons in whom it is not only related to weight of the load but also other factors such as the distance load being moved, load lift ing technique and frequent weight lift ing[31]. Theoretically, ability to handle weight and risk of in jury depend on individual strength. It is re lated to acute effect of physical load in which pa in occurs when the load e xceeds the tissue resistant. Lifting weight exceeding person ability will increase the risk of back injury[32]. These find ings agree with the review by[33] who described positive associations between lifting loads and bending. Another explanation may be the possible ignorance with regards to kinetic handling and ergonomics during these nursing activities which includes lifting, stooping over patients and transferring patients[15-16]. Table 7. Number of subjects who reported the following effects caused by their back pain (n = 57) Effe ct of back pain Restriction of activity Transfer to another position Thinking to leave nursing Taking many days off' Numbe r of responses 49 29 11 26 Respondents reported the negative effect their work schedule is having on them, they were allowed to make mu ltip le choices, forty nine reported that it makes them to restrict and limit their act ivit ies for the day and even have to take many days off as shown in Table 7.So me respondents suggested the need to increase staff numbers in order to reduce the workload of each indiv idual. As many sufferers fro m low back pain co mplain about being overworked, this may offer so me relief. Treat ment of back pain remains unsatisfactory as indicated in Table 8. Seventeen percent of the respondents with back pain in this study took some rest to relieve their back pain while thirty six percent take an alg es ics . Table 8. Management methods of low back pain I don’t do anything use of Painkillers Rest Use of back belt Reduce movement at work Reduce movement s at home Muscle relaxants Exercise Numbe r of responses 2 37 16 4 14 1 Management of LBP with physiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery has been well established[34] Acute back pain may not be relieved by bed rest while some studies have shown the positive effects of exercise[35] and continuous activity[36]. 4. Conclusions In conclusion, lo w back pain has been indicated to be the most prevalent occupation-relate problem across different International Journal of Nursing Science 2012, 2(3): 23-28 27 countries in both the developed and developing world. And, the results of the present study on low back pain among theatre nurses are higher (78%) but in line with other studies conducted in both developed and developing countries. Although prevalence of lo w back pain among nurses in Africa has not been widely exp lored, results of the few available studiesincluding the current results (78%) show that it is high. Ho wever, the researcher argues that although the prevalence of nurses’ low back pain is comparab le in both developed and underdeveloped countries, the working conditions in both settings might not be comparable. Nurses in the developed world may be working under improved working conditions, which is most likely not the case under which nurses in most African countries practice. Therefore, nurses in Africa, particu larly in Nigeria where the study was conducted, might be at higher risk of suffering low back pain than nurses in industrialized countries. This being due to the increased risk of work related injuries and thus reason for concern. The results of the current study will hopefully contribute to the scanty informat ion available in Africa. Nurses can be advised to do regular exercise to strengthen their back muscles, emp loyer to ensure ergonomic adjustment to reduce risk of back pain such as manual handling, awkward body position at work and monotonous work posture. The high incidence of back pain is brought about by factors which seem to be entirely preventable. It is apparent that nurses are taking risks or are pursuing questionable practices. In this situation, init ial nurse education will never be sufficient and the most obvious course of action seems to be periodic and continuous in-service training. The costs of training or maybe updating and purchasing specialized equipments (lifts, back belts, electronic adjustable beds) are easily justifiab le in terms of savings made by avoiding loss of nurs es to the profes sion, abs enteeism and potential danger to the patient. Strength and weaknesses of the study Strengths of the study The strength of the study is that there was a high response rate of 91%. This shows that the nurses were most willing to contribute to the study. As for the rest of the nurses (9%) who declined to participate in the study, they attributed it to one of the ethical considerations that clearly stated that participation in the study was voluntary. Weakness of the study One of the weaknesses of this study was the small sa mple size, thus the findings could not be generalized to all the clin ical nurses in Nigeria.. Operating Room. Published by the HDOEDIT (© ILO/CIS, 1999. [3] Cooper J.,Tate R.,Yassi A., Khokhar J. ‘Effect of an Early Intervention Program on the Relationship Between Subjective Pain and Disability M easures in Nurses With Low Back Injury’; 21(20), 2329-2336, 1996. [4] Yip BY. A study of work stress, patient handling activities and the risk of low back pain among nurses in Hong Kong. Journal of Advanced Nursing; 36(6): 794-804. [5] Brennan, G., Shafat, A., M ac Donncha, C., Vekins, C. Lower back pain in physically demanding college academic programs: a questionnaire based study. Bio-M edical Central M usculoskeletal Disorders, 13, 67-75, 2007. [6] Roffey, D.M ., Wai, E.K., Bishop, P., Kwon, B.K., Dagenais, S. Causal assessment of occupational sitting and low back pain: results of a systematic review. The Spine Journal, 10, 252-261, 2010. [7] Jansen J., Burdorf A., Steyerberg E. A novel approach for evaluation level, frequency and duration of lumbar posture simultaneously during work. Scand J Work Environ Health; 27(6):373-380, 2001. [8] M aul I., Laubi T., Kipstein A., Krueger H. Course of low back pain among nurses: a longitudinal study across eight years. Occupational and Environmental M edicine; 60: 497-503, 2003. [9] Smedley J., Cooper C. Prospective cohort study of predictors on incident low back pain in nurses. British M edical Journal; 314(7089): 1225- 1228, 1997. [10] Smith RD., Leggat AP. M usculoskeletal disorders among rural Australian nursing students.Aust J Rural Health; 12: 241-245, 2004. [11] Engkvist IL. Evaluation of an intervention comprising a No Lifting Policy in Australian hospitals.Applied Ergonomics; 37(2):141-8, 2006. [12] de Bono JP, Hudsmith LE, Bono de A. Back pain in pre-registration house officers. Occupational M edicine; 51(1):62-65, 2001. [13] Smith RD., Wei N., Zhao L., Wang RS. M usculoskeletal complaints and psychosocial risk factors among Chinese hospital nurses. Occupational M edicine; 54: 579-582, 2004. [14] Botha WE and Bridger RS 1998 Anthropometric variability equipment usability and musculoskletal pain in a group of nurses in the Western Cape, Applied Ergonomics, 29; 761-775 [15] Engels JA, van der Gulden JWJ, Senden TF, Van’t Hog B. Work related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the nursing profession: results of a questionnaire survey, Occupational and Environmental M edicine, 53; 636-641, 1996 REFERENCES [1] Online Available: http://www.iasp-pain.org [2] International Hazard Datasheets on Occupation: Nurse, [16] Sun J, He Z and Wang S. Prevalence and risk factors of occupational low back pain in ICU nurses, Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi, 25(8): 453-455, 2007. [17] Vasiliadou A., Karvountzis GG., Soumilas A., Roumeliotis D., Theodosopoulou E. Occupational low-back pain in nursing staff in a Greek hospital. Journal of Advanced Nursing; 21(1): 125-30, 1995. 28 Christiana D. Hinmikaiye et al.: The Incidence of Low Back Pain among Theatre Nurses: A Case Study of University of Ilorin and Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital [18] Bierring-Sorensen F. Low back trouble in a general population of 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old men and women. Study design, representative years, and basic results. Dan M ed Bull 29:289-299, 1982. [27] Tinubu, B.M .S., M bada, C.E., Oyeyemi, A.L. & Fabunmi, A.A. Work-Related M usculoskeletal Disorders among Nurses in Ibadan, South-west Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey. BM C Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11, 12-20, 2010. [19] Jeffries LJ, M ilanese SF and Grimmer-Somers KA 2007 Epidemiology of adolescent spinal pain: a systematic overview of the research literature, Spine,32 (23): 2630-2637 [20] Hellerstein JK, Neumark D and Troske KR. Wages, productivity and worker characteristics: evidence from plant level production function and wage equations, National Bureau of Economic Research working paper series, no 5626, 1996 [28] Goldman, R.H., Jarrad, M .R., Kim, R., Loomis, S. & Atkins, E.H. Prioritizing back injury risk in hospital employees: Application and comparison of different injury rates. Journal of Occupational and Environmental M edicine 42(6): 645-652, 2000. [29] Tollison David C, Relief from back pain, the Tollison programme, illustrated edition, Relief from back pain, the Tollison, 2008 [21] Bejia, I., Younes, M ., Jamila, H. B., Khalfallah, T., Ben Salem, K., Touzi, M ., Akrout, M ., Bergaoui, N. Prevalence and factors associated to low back pain among hospital staff. Joint Bone Spine, 72, 254-259, 2005. [22] Mwilila, M .C. Work-related low back pain among clinical nurses in Tanzania. Physiotherapy department, University of the Western Cape, 2008 [23] Sikiru, L. & Shmaila, H. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among nurses in Africa: Nigerian and Ethiopian specialized hospitals survey study. East African Journal of Public Health, 6, 22-25, 2009. [24] Cato C., Olson D.K., Studer, M .Incidence, prevalence, and variablesassociated with low back pain in staff nurses. AAOHN Journal, 37 (8), 321-327, 1989. [25] Knibbe JJ., Friele RD. Prevalence of back pain characteristics of the physical workload of community nurses. Ergonomics 39:186-98, 1996 [26] Omokhodion, F.O. Low back pain among rural and urban populations in Southwest Nigeria. African News Letter on Occupational Health & Safety, 12, 57-59, 2002. [30] Bulaitis, L. The hidden scandal. Nursing Times, 88(41), 24-26, 1992. [31] Nurminen, M ., Andersson, G.B.J. & Pope, M.H. 1997. M usculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. Principals and Practice.M issouri: M osby-Year Book Inc, 1997. [32] Waddell, G. The back pain revolution. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1998. [33] Burdorf A, Sorock G. Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 23:243–56, 1997. [34] Nwuga VBC. Nigeria, editor. M anual treatment of back pain. Nigeria, Ibadan: Shaneson CT Ltd; 1990. [35] Waddell G, Feder G, Lewis M . Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain. BrJ Gen Practice 47: 647-65, 1997 [36] M almivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T, The treatment of acute low back pain bed rest, exercises or ordinary activity? New Engl J M ed 332: 351-355, 1995.

... pages left unread,continue reading

Document pages: 6 pages

Please select stars to rate!

         

0 comments Sign in to leave a comment.

    Data loading, please wait...
×