eduzhai > Helth Sciences > Medical >

Drug non-compliance in patients with schizophrenia: prevalence and correlation of outpatients in tertiary medical institutions in Wuyu City, southern Nigeria

  • sky
  • (0) Download
  • 20211031
  • Save
https://www.eduzhai.net Clinical Medicine and Diagnostics 2015, 5(6): 107-113 DOI: 10.5923/j.cmd.20150506.01 Medication Non Adherence in Schizophrenia: Prevalence and Correlates among Outpatients in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Uyo, South-South Nigeria Jombo Henry Effiong1,*, Kufre Albert Umoh2 1Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria 2Department of family Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria Abstract Background: Treatment non adherence in patients with schizophrenia is the main reason for frequent relapses, poor treatment outcome, reduced quality of life and significant increases in healthcare cost. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of treatment non adherence in patients with schizophrenia and identify factors associated with it. Method: One hundred and twenty patients with schizophrenia receiving treatment in the mental health unit were randomly selected to participate in the study. Data were collected using a socio-demographic questionnaire, the 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-8), Drug attitude inventory (DAI-10), Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS). Logistic regression was used to determine significant variables associated with suboptimal adherence to medication. Results: The prevalence of treatment non-adherence was 51.7%. The factors significantly associated with treatment non adherence were a poor attitude to medication (OR 0.067,95%CI0.012-0.387, P-value 0.03) lack of supervised treatment (OR 0.117, 95%CI 0.038-0.352, P-value <0.001) experience of side effects (OR 4.40, 95%CI= 1.358-14.313 p-value 0.01). Cost of medication (OR 3.867, 95%CI 1.232-12.136) and a high negative PANSS score (t=-1.91, P value 0.04) Conclusion: Adherence to antipsychotic medications among patients with schizophrenia is suboptimal. The findings strongly recommend the need to develop a standard protocol for carrying out adherence counselling to all patients and their relatives. Keywords Schizophrenia, Antipsychotics, Adherence, Nigeria 1. Introduction Schizophrenia is a chronic mental disorder that causes prominent psychological dysfunction. It is one of the top 10 causes of long–term disability in the world. It affects about 1% of the population worldwide [1]. It is characterised by psychotic symptoms and runs a chronic course often resulting in repeated hospitalisation and a low quality of life [2]. Antipsychotic medications represent the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment for patients with schizophrenia. Although these agents have been shown to improve psychopathology, reduce relapse, improve functioning, non-adherence to treatment is common. Non adherence rates range from 20% to 89% with average of 50% reported in the literature [3, 4]. In the treatment of psychiatric disorders, non adherence may be defined as a failure to enter a treatment programme, premature termination of treatment or incomplete * Corresponding author: hjombo@yahoo.com (Jombo Henry Effiong) Published online at https://www.eduzhai.net Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved implementation of instructions including those that pertain to medication administration [5]. Medication non adherence is the best predictor of relapse after a psychotic episode [6] and thus is an important clinical and public health issue. Previous studies have shown factors associated with non-adherence to medical treatment. These factors are patient related factors, medication related factors and factors related to social and medical support. [7] Patient’s factors include age, economic status and health beliefs about medication. [8] Social and Medical support factors include among others family help and support and patient-healthcare provider relationship. Medication related factors take into account the attitude towards medicines, the complexity of the medication regimen, and the experience of side effects [9]. Generally, drug compliance in patients with schizophrenia is predicted by the patients’ subjective response to and attitude towards medication [10-12]. Positive attitude of patients towards treatment can improve therapeutic alliance, medication compliance and long term prognosis [13]. Attitude towards antipsychotic medication is significantly affected by factors such as lack of insight into the illness [14], degree of global psychopathology [14], and side effects of 108 Jombo Henry Effiong et al.: Medication Non Adherence in Schizophrenia: Prevalence and Correlates among Outpatients in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Uyo, South-South Nigeria medications [15, 16]. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of treatment non adherence in patients with schizophrenia and identify factors associated with it in my environment. towards medication, illness related variables (total duration of illness, severity of illness,) and medication related variables (number of tablets taken per day, cost of monthly medication, supervision of medication, type of medication, side effects of medication). 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Location of the Study This study was conducted at University of Uyo Teaching Hospital from July 2014 to November 2014. The hospital is located in Uyo, the capital city of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. The hospital is a 450 bed capacity tertiary healthcare centre that offers secondary and tertiary care. It receives referral from primary and secondary healthcare facilities in the state as well as from the neighbouring states. 2.2. Subjects The sample size was calculated using a public domain software available on-line (www.statpages.org) [17] using a prevalence of treatment non adherence as determined from previous studies (52%) [18] The sample consisted of one hundred and thirty two (n=132) patients with schizophrenia who were randomly selected based on the table of random number on each clinic visit. A subject was enrolled if he/she met the following inclusion criteria: a diagnosis of Schizophrenia, subjects who had been on medications for at least one year prior to study entry, adults above the age of 18years, and who granted consent. The exclusion criteria were: current florid psychopathology capable of impairing response and co morbid psychoactive substance use or physical disorders. 2.4.2. Medication Profile The medication profile of each respondent was obtained through review of the medication record files domiciled in the hospital. Data recorded include: The number of antipsychotic medicines on the patients treatment regimen, the class of medication, the frequency of intake of medication. The side effects of medication. 2.4.3. Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) The compliance level of patients was defined by the application of the MMAS-8. The MMAS is a reliable and validated 8 items; self reported measure of medication use patterns. Each item on the MMAS measures a specific medication-taking behaviour. Each of the item is presented in a “yes or no” format. These involve asking the patient about the extent and tendency to forget to take their medication and their discontinuance of medication treatment upon feeling that their condition has improved or worsened. Answers were scored as 0 or 1, with score 1 corresponding to positive answers. The item scores obtained from the MMAS are summed to indicate an overall level of medication adherence [22]. The MMAS scores range from zero to eight and have been stratified into three levels to classify adherence levels: high adherence-MMAS score of 8, moderate adherence-MMAS scores of 5 to 7 and low adherence-MMAS score of less than or equal to 4. 2.3. Procedure Approval for the study was obtained from the Research and Ethical Committee of the University of Uyo teaching Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from patients and their accompanying family members. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited into the study after a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation and diagnosis by resident doctors in psychiatry. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) English Version 5.0.0 [19] was further used to confirm the diagnosis of schizophrenia in the participants. The MINI was designed as a brief structured interview for the major Axis 1 diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) [20] and ICD-10. 2.4. Measures 2.4.1. Semi-structured Questionnaire A questionnaire designed by the authors was used to obtain information Measures evaluated included socio-demographic details (age of the patient and family member, gender, educational status, marital status, religion, monthly family income, place of stay, occupation), attitude 2.4.4. Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Severity of illness was measured using positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) [23]. It is a 30-item scale. Seven constitute a positive scale, seven a negative scale, and the remaining sixteen a general psychopathology scale. For each item, ratings are made on a 1–7 scale of increasing levels of psychopathology ranging from absent to extreme. The scores for the scales are arrived by summation of ratings for the component items. The Interrater reliability was established (r=0.82). 2.4.5. Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI 10) The attitude towards antipsychotic medication was assessed using 10 item drug attitude inventory (DAI). It is a self report questionnaire consisting of true/false statements about the perceived effects and benefits of antipsychotics with which the patients can agree or disagree. Each item ticked ‘yes’ is rated +1 and items ticked ‘no’ is rated as -1. The positive scores and negative scores are calculated and the total score will be positive score minus negative score. The positive total score indicates positive attitude and negative total score indicates negative attitude towards antipsychotic medications [24]. Clinical Medicine and Diagnostics 2015, 5(6): 107-113 109 All the questionnaires were translated into Ibibio language separately by two bilingual translators. The two versions were combined and revised and then back translated into English by another bilingual translator. The translation was refined after back translation until agreement was obtained among the four people involved in the translations. Data Analysis Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, median, mean and standard deviation were computed for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants and other variables as appropriate. Relevant inferential statistics such as chi-square and t-test were used to determine the relationship between outcome and independent variables. Significant variables were entered into a regression analysis to determine predictors of attitude to medication and treatment adherence. Significance was computed at p < 0.05. 3. Results Of the 132 participants in the study, 12 had incomplete data, so the result of 120 subjects was used for analysis. Females constituted (55.8%) of the subjects. The majority were single (71.7%) and unemployed (60.0%). Most of the subjects (57.5%) had secondary education as the highest level of education attained (Table 1). Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of participants Characteristics Participants N (%) Age (Mean=35.92±11.09, Range=20-60) ≤40years 81(67.5) >40 years 39(32.5) Gender male 53(44.2) female 67(55.8) Marital status Single 86(71.7) Married 34(28.3) Educational status Primary 12(10.0) Secondary 57(47.5) Tertiary 51(42.5) Employment status Employed 48(40.0) Unemployed 72(60.0) Living in supported housing With someone 107(89.2) Alone 13(10.8) Treatment supervision Supervised 55(42.3) Not supervised 75(57.7) Duration of illness (Mean=9.83±7.65, Range=1-32) ≤10years 96(73.8) >10years 34(26.2) Medication adherence levels of the participants 28.3% of the subjects were categorized as low adherence, 23.4% were categorized as medium adherence and 48.3% were classified as high adherence. The overall prevalence of non adherence was 51.7% using an MMAS cut-off score of ≤7 adapted for this study. The findings are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Distribution of clinical variables in the subjects Variables Participants N (%) Class of medication Conventional Atypical Dosing frequency Once per day More than once per day Medication cost ($=#210) ≤#3000 per month >#3000 per month Medication side effects Extrapyramidal side effects Sedation Weight gain Hyperprolactin Anticholinergic Sexual problems No side effects Treatment adherence High Medium Low Attitude to medication Positive Negative PANSS Positive subscale (mean, SD) Negative subscale (mean, SD) General psychopathology(mean, SD) 74(62.7) 44(37.3) 59(49.2) 61(50.8) 74(61.7) 46(38.3) 20(16.7) 9(7.5) 15(12.5) 8(6.7) 5(4.2) 4(3.3) 39(32.5) 58(48.3) 28(23.4) 34(28.3) 64(53.3) 56(46.7) 30.59±9.06 18.80±10.13 41.50±13.05 Distribution of the variables influencing adherence 53% of the respondents were on conventional antipsychotics and the three most commonly prescribed first generation antipsychotics were: Haloperidol (38.6%), Chlorpromazine (34.6%) and trifluperazine (20.2%). The commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics were Olanzepine (52.4%) Risperidone (40.6%). (50.8%) had a doing frequency of more than once per day. 38.2% of subjects spend more than #3000 ($=#210 equivalent) on medication monthly and 42.3% of subjects reported some form of supervision of treatment. Responses to question designed to access attitude to medication show that 55.6% of subjects reported they never cut back nor stopped taking their medication upon feeling that their condition has worsened or improved. Slightly above average number of subjects (53.3%) reported overall positive attitude to medication. Attitude to medication was significantly 110 Jombo Henry Effiong et al.: Medication Non Adherence in Schizophrenia: Prevalence and Correlates among Outpatients in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Uyo, South-South Nigeria associated with increased social support expressed as availability of supervised treatment (x2=29.59, p<0.001) and medication dosing frequency with those taking medication once daily having a more positive attitude towards medication compared to those taking medication more than once per day (x2=7.06, p=0.008) Variables associated with non adherence in the subjects The years of formal education, duration of illness, marital status, age of participants did not show a significant association with medication adherence. On bivariate analysis, the variables that are significantly associated with non adherence to medication include cost of medication (x2=6.46, p value=0.01), dosing frequency (x2=24.27, p<0.001), side effects of medication (x2=11.9, p <0.001), attitude to medication (x2=34.6, p<0.001) and the degree of negative symptoms (t=-1.91, p=0.04) Table 3. Association between socio-demographic variables and adherence to medication Variables Adherent (n%) Non adherent (n%) Statistics X2 P-value Age ≤40years >40 years Gender Male Female Marital status Married Single Educational level ≤6years >6 years Employment Employed Not employed Duration of illness ≤10 years >10 years Supervision of treatment Supervised Not supervised Medication cost ($=#210) ≤#3000 per month >#3000 per month 43(53.1) 19(48.7) 30(56.6) 32(47.8) 22(64.7) 40(46.5) 16(57.1) 46(50.0) 29(60.4) 33(45.8) 46(51.7) 33(45.8) 44(84.6) 18(26.6) 45(60.8%) 17(37.0) 38(46.9) 20(51.3) 23(43.4) 35(52.2) 12(35.3) 46(53.5) 12(42.9) 46(50.0) 19(39.6) 39(54.2) 43(48.3) 15(48.4) 8(15.4) 50(73.4) 29(39.2%) 29(63.0) 0.20 0.93 3.23 0.44 2.45 0.00 39.89 6.46 0.65 0.34 0.07 0.51 0.12 0.99 <0.001 0.01 Table 4. Shows association of clinical variables and treatment adherence Variables Adherent N(%) Non adherent N(%) Statistics P-value Attitude to medication Positive Negative Experience of side effects yes No Dosing frequency Once per day ≥twice per day Class of medication Conventional Atypical PANSS Positive subscale Negative subscale 47(73.4) 11(19.6) 33(40.7%) 29(74.4) 45(73.8) 17(28.8) 34(45.9) 26(59.1) 30.32±9.4 17.11±9.4 17(26.6) 45(80.4) 48(59.3%) 10(25.6) 16(26.2) 42(71.2) 40(54.1) 18(40.9) 30.88±8.7 20.60±8.8 x2= 34.6 x2=11.9 x2 =24.27 x2=1.91 t=-0.34 t=-1.91 <0.001 0.001 <0.001 0.17 0.64 0.04 Clinical Medicine and Diagnostics 2015, 5(6): 107-113 111 Table 5. Predictors of adherence by logistic regression analysis Variables OR 95%C.I Dosing frequency Experience of side effects Cost of medication Supervision of treatment Attitude to medication 0.343 4.40 3.867 0.117 0.16 0.06-1.957 1.358-`14.313 1.232-12.136 0.038-0.352 0.061-0.40 P-value 0.23 0.01 0.02 <0.001 <0.001 Multivariate analysis for factors associated with non adherence The significant variables were then entered into regression analysis to determine predictors of treatment adherence. The variables fitted into logistic regression model for multivariate analysis were lack of availability of supervised treatment (OR=0.117, 95%CI 0.038-0.352, P-value<0.001), a negative attitude to medication (OR=0.067, p-value <0.001), cost of medication (OR 3.867,95%CI 1.232-12.136, P value=0.02), Dosing frequency (OR 4.40, P value 0.01) and experience of side effects (OR 4.40, 95%CI 1.358-14.313, P= 0.01) 4. Discussion The prevalence of treatment non-adherence in this study was 51.7% indicating that almost one in two patients were non-compliant with their medications. Similar rates have been reported in studies conducted in other regions of Nigeria [19, 25]. Studies conducted in other countries have indicated that over 60% of patients with schizophrenia were non compliant with medication [26, 27, 28]. The variations in the reported rates of treatment non adherence between these studies may be due to differences in the methods used in estimating adherence, different cut-off values and some peculiar characteristics of the study populations. Nevertheless, this level of non adherence is bound to translate to increased morbidity, relapses and rehospitalisation and increased cost burden of management. In this study, socio-demographic variables of the participants had insignificant impact on treatment adherence. Some subjects’ characteristics were found to influence treatment adherence to varying degree but their impact were not significant statistically. In previous studies, demographic variables have not been consistently associated with medication non compliance. Present study results are in support of the previous findings that there is no significant relationship of adherence with gender [29], age and marital status [30]. Although patients who were less than 40 years of age, who were married and who were employed were more likely to be adherent to treatment though, their impact were not statistically significant. We found a significant association between attitude to medication and treatment adherence. Previous study had reported that attitude to medication was an indirect representation of adherence to treatment [31]. We found an average level of general positive attitude to medication among patients with schizophrenia. Subjects with positive attitude were significantly more likely to adhere to medication compared to those with poor attitude. Previous studies showed some features of mental disorders which were significantly associated with attitude to medication like having insight, the degree of psychopathology and the side effects burden of medication [11-13]. It has also been reported that beliefs regarding the need for treatment and the benefit of treatment may affect medication adherence in a patient [31]. In this study, the degree of involvement of relatives in the management of patients and the dosing frequency of medication were significantly associated with positive attitude to medication. Also, from a cultural perspective, the patients’ belief systems and cultural values may be associated with poor attitude to medication and non-adherence since some patients may prefer traditional spiritual healing over conventional medical treatment. The belief in spiritual causation of mental disorders may influence patients and their caregivers help seeking behaviour and attitude to medication in believing that a spiritual solution is required to resolve their mental health problems and therefore treatment with orthodox medicine becomes futile [19]. However, the degree of positive attitude observed in this study may be related to more discernable improvements in treatments outcomes in orthodox setting compared to the treatment outcomes in religious and traditional medical settings. The degree of psychopathology has been cited as an important reason for poor attitude to medication and treatment non adherence. We found a significant association between the degree of negative symptoms and treatment adherence. Previous studies had reported that higher positive symptom, PANSS score predicts noncompliance. [31] Fenton et al reported in their study that the severity of psychopathology and failure to respond to treatment are associated with non adherence to treatment [32]. In this study, increased negative symptoms was a risk factor for non adherence. This partly can be attributed to the social, emotional withdraw and lack of volition seen in these patients which may impair their ability to comply with medication. Social support may become crucial to enhance treatment adherence. The availability of family or friends to assist or supervise medications has been consistently associated with outpatient adherence [33]. In this study, patients who were supervised at treatment were significantly more likely to adhere to 112 Jombo Henry Effiong et al.: Medication Non Adherence in Schizophrenia: Prevalence and Correlates among Outpatients in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Uyo, South-South Nigeria medication compared to those who were not supervised. This outcome seems related to the fact that relatives’ involvement in treatment will ensure compliance with treatment and regular long term follow up management. The role of medication related variables in adherence was also explored in this study. The independent medication-related predictors of non adherence found in this study were; the cost of the medications, the dosing frequency and the side effects profile. The side effects burden has been reported as an important reason for treatment non compliance [10]. Casey noted that for many patients, extra pyramidal side-effects (EPS), weight gain, and sexual dysfunction are especially likely to decrease adherence [34]. Our finding is in agreement with studies that have found a significant relationship between extra-pyramidal side-effects [10, 33] and in disagreement with those studies that found no such relationship [35]. In terms of the cost of the medications, the higher the cost of the medication per day, the higher the rate of non-adherence. This partly may be due to the observation in this study that a high proportion of participants (60.0%) were unemployed and majority (57.5) were observed to have had less than 12 years of formal education implying that most patients with schizophrenia are from a low socioeconomic background. This implies that limited financial resources are available to fund medicare especially as funding for healthcare in mainly out-of-pocket in the absence of comprehensive health insurance scheme in a resource poor setting like ours. This study has some limitations. Self reports were utilized in the assessment and measurement of medication adherence; this may occasionally be unreliable and biased. This is due to self reported measures being subject to recall bias and recall difficulties. The cross sectional nature of the study cannot establish causality. Therefore the value may remain exploratory. Also, standardised measures were not used in determining the side effects profile of the subjects. In conclusion, this study has shown that the level of adherence to treatment is suboptimal among out-patients with schizophrenia in our setting and that strategies that encourage family member’s participation in patient’s management will significantly improve treatment adherence. Review of Recent Literature. J Clin. Psychiatry.2002;63(10): 892-909. [4] Fenton, W.S., Blyer, C.R., Heinssen, R.K.. Determinants of Medication Compliance in Schizophrenia. Empirical and Clinical Findings. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1997;23: 637-651. [5] Nose M, Bar bui C. and Tansella M. How often do Patients with Psychosis Fail to Adhere to Treatment Programmes? A Systematic Review. Psychol. Med. 2003;33 (7): 1149-1160. [6] Misdrahi D, Llorca PM, Lancon C, Bayle FJ. Compliance in schizophrenia: predictive factors, therapeutic considerations and research implications. Encephale 2002;28:266-272 (in French). [7] Haynes R.B, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane data base. Syst Rev. 2008;(2); CD000011. [8] Naber D, Karow A, Lambert M. Subjective well-being under neuroleptic treatment and its relevance to compliance. Acta Psychiatr Scan 2005; 111:232-243. [9] Buchanan A. A two year prospective study of treatment compliance in patients with schizophrenia. Psychol Med 1992;22: 787-797 [10] Freudenreich O, Cather C, Evins AE, Henderson DC, Goff DC. Attitudes of schizophrenia outpatients toward psychiatric medications: relationship to clinical variables and insight. J Clin Psychiatry2004; 65:1372-1376. [11] Dixon L, Weiden P, Torres M, Lehman AM. Assertive community treatment and medication compliance in the homeless mentally ill. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:1302-1304. [12] Fleischhacker WW, Meise U, Gunther V, Kurz M. Compliance with Anti-psychotic Drug Treatment: Influence of Side Effects. Acta Psychaitric Scand 1994; Suppl 382:11-15. [13] Kemp R, Kirov G, Everitt B, Hayward P, David A. Randomised Controlled trail of Compliance Therapy: 18-month Follow Up. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1998;1772:413-419. [14] Hofer A, Kemmler G, Eder U, Honeder M, Hummer M, Fleischhacker WW. Attitude towards antipsychotics among outpatient clinic attendees with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 2002: 49-53 [15] Adelufosi AO, Adebowale TO, Abayomi O, Mosanya JT. Medication adherence and quality of life among Nigerian outpatients with schizophrenia. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2012;;34(1):72-9. REFERENCES [1] Mueser, K.T, Mc Gurk, S.R. Schizophrenia. Lancet 2004; 363: 2063-2072. [2] Williams R, Dickson RA: Economics of schizophrenia. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 1995; 40:(2)S60-S67. [3] Lacro, J.P., Dunn, L.B., Dolder, C.R., Leckband, S.G., Jeske, D.V. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Medication non adherence in Patient with Schizophrenia: a Comprehensive [16] World Health Organisation (WHO), ICD 10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 10th edition, 1992. [17] www.statpages.org. [18] Adewuya AO, Owoeye OA, Erinfolami AR, Coker AO, Ogun OC, Okewole AO, Dada MU, Eze CN, Bello-Mojeed MA, Akindipe TO, Olagunju AT, Etim E. Prevalence and correlates of poormedication adherence amongst psychiatric patients in South-western Nigeria. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2009; 31(2):167-174. Clinical Medicine and Diagnostics 2015, 5(6): 107-113 113 [19] Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatricinterview for DSM-IV and ICD-10, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1998;59(20) :22– 33. [20] Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, Ward H. Predictive validity of a Medication adherence measure for hypertension control. J. Clin.Hypertens.2008;10(5):348-354. [21] Kay SR, Fiszbein A, and Opler LA .The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1987;13(2) 261–276. [27] Sackett LD, Haynes RB, Gordon HG, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine. Textbook of Clinical Epedermiology, 2nd edn. London; Little, Brown and Company; 1991. P. 249-277. [28] Diaz E, Neuse E, Sullivan MC, Pearsall HR, Woods SW. Adherance to conventional and atypical antipsychotic after hospital discharge. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65(3):354-60. [29] Baby R, S Gupta S, Sagar R. Attitudes and subjective reasons of medication compliance and noncompliance among outpatients with schizophrenia in India. The Internet Journal of Epidemiology. 2008 Volume 7 Number 1. [22] Hogan TP, Awad AG, Eastwood RA. Self Report Scale Predictive of Drug Compliance in Schizophrenic: Rehabilitative and Discriminative Validity. Psychological Medicine 1983;13: 177-183. [30] Adewuya AO, Ola BA, Mosaku SK, Fatoye FO, Egunranti AB. Attitude towards antipsychotics among outpatients with schizophrenia in Nigeria. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006;113:207-211. [23] Ibrahim AW, Pindar SK, Yerima MM, Rabbebe IB, Shehu S, Garkuwa HA, Bashir iy, Wakil MA, Yahya SJ. Medication related factors of non adherence among patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Outcome of cross sectional survey in Maiduguri, North-eastern Nigeria. Journal of Neuroscience and behavioural health 2015;7(5)31-39. [24] Kane JM. Compliance issues in outpatient treatment. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1985;5(supp. 3):22S-27S. [25] Kissling W. Compliance, quality assurance and standards for relapse prevention in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994;89:187-190. [26] Amr M, El-Mogy A, El-Masry R (2013). Adherence in Egyptian patients with schizophrenia: the role of insight, medication beliefs and spirituality. Arab J. Psychiatry 2013; 24(1):60-68. [31] Fenton WS., Blyer CR. Heinssen RK. Determinants of Medication Compliance in Schizophrenia. Empirical and Clinical Findings. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1997; 23: 637-651. [32] Razali MS, Yahya H. Compliance with treatment in schizophrenia: A drug intervention program in a developing program. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1995;91:331-335. [33] Casey, D.E. Barriers to progress-the impact of tolerability problems. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2001; 16 suppl 1:S15-19. [34] Lacro, J.P., Dunn, L.B., Dolder, C.R., Leckband, S.G., Jeske, D.V. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Medication non adherence in Patient with Schizophrenia: a Comprehensive Review of Recent Literature. J Clin. Psychiatry. 2002;63(10): 892-909.

... pages left unread,continue reading

Document pages: 7 pages

Please select stars to rate!

         

0 comments Sign in to leave a comment.

    Data loading, please wait...
×