eduzhai > Helth Sciences > Medical >

Clinicopathological features and clinical correlation of pregnancy induced hypertension syndrome

  • sky
  • (0) Download
  • 20211031
  • Save
https://www.eduzhai.net Clinical Medicine and Diagnostics 2019, 9(2): 21-25 DOI: 10.5923/j.cmd.20190902.01 Pregnancy Induced Hypertension: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Clinical Correlations Aaliya Shah1,2, Mosin S. Khan2, Adila Rashid2, Tabassum Parvez3, Mir Kaisar2, Syed Mudassar2,* 1Department of Biochemistry, SKIMS Medical College and Hospital, Bemina, Srinagar 2Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar Abstract Gestational hypertension (GH) or pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) is a condition characterised by high blood pressure during pregnancy. PIH can lead to serious condition called Pre-Eclampsia or Toxemia. The condition prevents placenta from getting enough blood resulting in low birth weight. Present study is a prospective case control study elucidating the effect of various demographic, clinicopathological and obstetric parameters on PIH. A total of 120 females with PIH and 150 normotensive pregnant females were included in the study. The survey was conducted using an interviewer administered questionnaire. The mean systolic and diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) of subjects with PIH was found to be 148.2 ± 5.5 and 96.2 ± 5.8 respectively. PIH was found to be statistically associated with occupation, socio-economic status, history of PIH, previous miscarriage, family history of hypertension and diabetes (P≤0.05). The results of the present study clearly pinpoint the cluster of factors that are associated with gestational hypertension. Identifying these factors may provide a window to clinicians and help them to recognize mothers who have higher chances to develop hypertensive disorders. Keywords Pregnancy induced hypertension, Gestational hypertension, Pregnancy, Blood pressure 1. Introduction Pregnancy is a unique and special time for the mothers as well as their families. Nonetheless the condition is associated with certain risks to the mother and the child she bears. These risks are common in every society and every setting but in developed countries these risks have been largely overcome because every pregnant woman has access to special care. Hypertension during pregnancy is one such condition that has an impact on the mother and child. It represents a global concern and complicates 5 to 10% of pregnancies [1]. In fact, these disorders are a major cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide accounting for more than 40,000 maternal deaths annually [1]. The prevalence of hypertensive disorders in pregnancies varies according to geographic regions of world which can be attributed to the racial differences and socio economic status [2]. However, in developing countries hypertensive disorders account for 1/3rd of maternal mortality [3, 4]. PIH is characterized by new onset elevation of blood pressure after 20 weeks of gestation which usually resumes * Corresponding author: syed.mudassar@skims.ac.in (Syed Mudassar) Published online at https://www.eduzhai.net Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ back to normal after the delivery of the child. PIH though temporary in nature may be a future alarm for chronic hypertension. It serves as a marker for chronic hypertension later in life and can help to design preventive medical strategies [5, 6]. Risk factors postulated to influence the risk of pregnancy induced hypertension among mothers include socio demographical factors, genetic factors, pregnancy factors or personal medical history of diabetes mellitus and chronic renal disease. A study by Assis et al. identified several risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and these can be related to regional and ethnic factors [7]. In 2017, Rouf et al. reported 20% incidence of pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) in a block of Srinagar district [8]. However, there is paucity of information about the characters associated with gestational hypertension from our part of the world (North India). Thus, this study is designed to have understanding about the socio-demographic and psychosocial and obstetric characters of hypertensive mothers of Kashmir valley. 2. Materials and Methods Study design The present study is a hospital-based prospective case control study conducted in the Department of Clinical Biochemistry in collaboration with Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Srinagar. All the study subjects with PIH 22 Aaliya Shah et al.: Pregnancy Induced Hypertension: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Clinical Correlations attending Department of Gynecology, SKIMS, Srinagar were included in the study. A written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects. Ethical approval was given by the Institutional Ethical Committee of SKIMS. Patients and Controls A case was defined as a woman of 20-40 years in the prenatal care diagnosed by the gynecologist as hypertensive. In this regard, gestational hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg originating after 20 week of gestation. A control was defined as age and gestation period (post 20 week) matched normotensive pregnant women. The survey was conducted using an interviewer administered questionnaire in the native language of the respondent using a local, commonly understood term for all the health problems during pregnancy. The questionnaire included information regarding socio- demographic and obstetric characteristics of women keeping in view the aims of the study. Sample size A total of 270 subjects in the age of 20-40 years were examined in this study. Out of these, 120 were pregnant hypertensive females (cases) and 150 were pregnant normotensive females (controls). Inclusion and exclusion criteria Clinically diagnosed hypertensive mothers with gestational age of >20 weeks; normal pregnant women in the same gestational age were included in the study while as women with known hypertension, renal diseases, liver diseases, severe anemia and diabetes were excluded from the study. Statistical Analysis The data was described as mean ± SD. Analysis was done by student’s t-test, Mann Whitney U-test and F-test (ANOVA). P <0.05 was considered significant. Data was analyzed using SPSS ver. 20.0. 3. Results Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) of normotensive pregnant women & women with PIH is shown in Table 1. The mean systolic and diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) of pregnant subjects with hypertension was found to be 148.2 ± 5.5 and 96.2 ± 5.8 respectively (Table 1). Two blood pressure readings were taken and average of both readings was taken. Those pregnant women who had average reading of systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure of more than 90 mmHg were taken as hypertensive. The Table 2 shows the mean maternal age and gestational age in the normotensive pregnant and hypertensive pregnant group. Table 3 defines the demographic and obstetric characteristic of cases and controls. Out of 120 cases, 17.5% (21 of 120) were urban dwellers and out of 150 controls only 10% (15 of 150) were urban dwellers (P>0.05). Almost 36% of patients with PIH were employed as compared to only 20% of controls who were employed (P=0.003). 80% of patients belonged to Lower middle class families compared to only 34.6% of controls with lower middle class background and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.0001). It is very much pertinent to mention that the 65% patients had previous history of PIH as compared to controls were only 10% were having previous history of PIH (P<0.0001). Also, 23.3% of patients had recurrent miscarriage as compared to only 5.3% of controls with who have had miscarriage (P<0.0001). Family history of hypertension and diabetes were significantly associated with patients when compared with controls (P<0.0001). No statistical significance was found between cases and controls as far as other demographic and obstetric characteristic were considered (P>0.05). Table 1. Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) of normotensive pregnant women & pregnant hypertensive Blood Pressure (BP) (mmHg) Mean Systolic Mean Diastolic Normotensive Pregnant or Control group (n=150) 118.1± 6.1 77.3 ± 6.2 Pregnant with Hypertension or Cases (n=120) 148.2 ± 5.5 96.2 ± 5.8 Table 2. Age (in years), gestational age (in weeks) in normal pregnancy and with pregnancy induced hypertension Age in years Normotensive Pregnant group (Controls) Hypertensive Pregnant group (Cases) Gestational Age in weeks Normotensive Pregnant group (Controls) Hypertensive Pregnant group (Cases) All values are mean ± SD 28.54 ± 3.24 30.12 ± 3.26 38.29 ± 2.32 38.32 ± 3.23 S. No. 1. 2. Table 3. Demographic and Obstetric characteristic of cases and controls Characteristics Residence Urban Rural Occupation House maker Employed Cases (n=120) Controls (n=150) OR (95% CI) 21 (17.5) 99 (82.5) 15 (10.0) 135 (90.0) 0.5 (0.2-1.06) 77 (64.1) 43 (35.9) 120 (80.0) 30 (20.0) 2.2 (1.3-3.8) P Value 0.07 0.003 Clinical Medicine and Diagnostics 2019, 9(2): 21-25 23 S. No. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Characteristics Family type Joint Nuclear Socio Economic status Lower middle class Middle class Stay during pregnancy In laws With parents History of PIH Yes No Previous Miscarriage Yes No Pregnancy type Singleton Twin Family history of Hypertension Yes No Family history of Diabetes Yes No Cases (n=120) 104 (86.6) 16 (13.4) 96 (80.0) 24 (20.0) 60 (50.0) 60 (50.0) 78 (65.0) 42 (35.0) 28 (23.3) 92 (76.7) 118 (98.3) 02 (1.7) 74 (61.6) 46 (38.4) 66 (55.0) 54 (45.0) Controls (n=150) 140 (93.3) 10 (16.7) 52 (34.6) 98 (65.4) 80 (53.3) 70 (46.7) 15 (10.0) 135 (90.0) 08 (5.3) 142 (94.7) 149 (99.3) 01 (0.7) 27 (18.0) 123 (82.0) 12 (8.0) 138 (92.0) OR (95% CI) 2.1 (0.9-4.9) 0.13 (0.07-0.23) 1.1 (0.7-1.8) 0.06 (0.03-0.1) 0.18 (0.08-0.42) 2.5 (0.2-28.1) 0.35(0.25-0.49) 0.07 (0.03-0.14) P Value 0.06 <0.0001 0.5 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.4 <0.0001 <0.0001 PIH: Pregnancy induced Hypertension 4. Discussion A mean maternal age greater than 30 years is an established risk factor for hypertension during pregnancy [9]. In our findings this association could not be demonstrated as our study is matched by age. In our study, we found similar prevalence of PIH in rural and urban Kashmir (P>0.05). The number of patients and controls from rural settings was more as compared to urban settings which might be due to the fact that the government hospitals mostly enrol patients of rural areas. These results are corroborated by report from Sachdeva et al. who pointed that the incidence of PIH is more in rural areas [10]. In our set up most of the urban dwellers tend to prefer private hospitals for antenatal care; hence these results cannot be generalized for the entire population. We observed a strong association between maternal employment and gestational hypertension. Job strain has been found to have a strong association with the development of essential hypertension [11, 12]. Our reports are in concurrence with the previous studies, who found that working mothers are at increased risk of PIH [13, 14]. In our study we found that mothers of lower middle class families were at a high risk and vulnerable to develop hypertension. One possible reason could be that women in low socio-economic status are often presented with nutritional issues, unhygienic conditions and receive reduced antenatal care. These results are in track with that of Parmar et al. [15]. Similarly, Shazia et al. reported that PIH and caesarean section are significantly more in lower socio-economic class as compared to their upper socio-economic counterparts [16]. We wanted to figure out the influence of pyscho-social aspects concerning the mothers. So we tried to dig out whether the need for respecting and caring for elders and other members and as such residing in a joint family which is usually perceived to be associated with an uneasy environment was an influencing factor for developing hypertension in pregnant women. It is an established fact that the quality of family relations is an important ingredient in shaping the maternal health [17]. However, our cohort did not show any difference whether residing in a joint or nuclear family. The women (both cases and controls) in our survey reported a healthy bonding with the members of their joint families. Nonetheless, in our social set up women prefer to stay at their parent’s place during pregnancy. We got interested and evaluated whether choosing their place of stay has any impact on their hypertensive profile. However, we did not find any significant association between the two. One explanation for no apparent difference could be that our study did not cover all sections of the society since we present data of women coming to our hospital only. History of gestational hypertension is a well-documented risk factor for hypertension in subsequent pregnancies. Our results supported the fact as majority of females in the hypertensive group had previous history of PIH. These results are very much in accordance with the previously 24 Aaliya Shah et al.: Pregnancy Induced Hypertension: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Clinical Correlations reported data [18]. Our study showed that in hypertensive mother’s history of previous miscarriage was statistically significant. We found similar results with regard to the association of previous history of miscarriage and onset of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy [19]. One plausible explanation could be that miscarriages are often associated with high levels of distress for mothers. There are reports that confirm the release of corticotrophin releasing hormone in response to psychological stress thus establishing the link between social and biological processes. Also such mothers expressed helplessness and a feeling of guilt which could cause biological alterations in such mothers. Although multiple pregnancy is a well-established risk factor for PIH [20] but to our surprise our study could not further establish the link owing to the fact that there were very low number of cases as well as control subjects with twin pregnancies. Majority of hypertensive mothers mentioned at least one of their family members as being hypertensive. These results are in accordance with that reported by Ness et al. who reported that pregnant women with family history of hypertension were at higher risk for developing PIH [21]. Family history of diabetes was significantly higher in women with PIH as compared to the control group. Our observations support the findings of Sancheo et al. [22]. Although there is no known way to prevent PIH, it is important for all pregnant women to start prenatal care early and continue it throughout pregnancy. It is commonly believed that salt restriction during pregnancy helps in providing relief during increased blood pressure. However, there is lack of significant data to support the idea. Reports have suggested that hypertensive mothers have a higher chance to have a caesarean section. Hence, a healthy lifestyle should be necessarily adopted by mothers prior to pregnancy to prevent hypertension during pregnancy and its associated complications. 5. Conclusions The results of the present study clearly pinpoint the cluster of factors that are associated with gestational hypertension. Identifying these factors may provide a window to clinicians and help them to recognize mothers who have higher chances to develop hypertensive disorders. In order to draw a better statistical correlation, the study needs to be elaborated by increasing the sample size so as to cover all the sections of the society. Despite limitations, these findings can serve as an important call for healthcare policy makers to develop strategies for high quality antenatal care in order to prevent hypertension and its sequel in the next generation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical staff of the Department of Gynaecology and Clinical Biochemistry, SKIMS, Srinagar who helped us in procuring the blood samples. Compliance with Ethical Standards The study was approved by the Ethical Clearance Committee of SKIMS (SIMS 1 131/IEC-SKIMS/2015-188). Funding The Study was supported by Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Kashmir 190011 India (Grant no# SIMS/Acad/156 of 2017 dated: March 24, 2017). REFERENCES [1] Hutcheon JA, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Epidemology of pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 25: 391-403. [2] Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102(1): 181-192. [3] Imdad A, Jabeen A, Bhutta ZA. Role of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing risk of developing gestational hypertensive disorders: metaanalysis of studies from developing countries. BMC Public Health 2011; 13:11-20. [4] Pelta LT, Chikkada R, Ratnakar KS, Kodati V, Sritharan V. Biomarkers for the management of pre-eclampsia in pregnant women. The Indian Journal of Medical Research 2013; 138:60-66. [5] Willaim D. Long term complication of pre-eclampsia. Semin Nephrol 2011; 31(1): 111-122. [6] Ali A, Yunus M, Islam HM. Clinico-epidemol study of factors associated with pregnancy induced hypertension. Indian Journal of Community medicine 1998; 32(1): 25-29. [7] Assis TR, Viana FP. Study on major risk factors in hypertensive syndrome. Arq Bras cardiol 2008; 91(1): 11-17. [8] Rouf Hussain Rather, Mohammad Salim Khan, Shahnaaz Taing. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 2017; 4(7): 2333-2338. [9] Bener A, Saleh NM. The impact of socio-economic, lifestyle habits and obesity in developing of pregnancy induced hypertension in fast growing country: global comparison. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2013; 40: 52-57. [10] Sachdeva PD, Patel BG, Bhatt MV. A study of incidence and management of pregnancy induced hypertension in Central Gujrat, India. International Journal of Universal Pharmacy and Life Sciences 2011; 1(3): 61-70. [11] Schnall PL, Lands bergis PA, Baker D. Job strain and cardiovascular disease. Ann Rev Public Health. 1994; 15: 381-411. Clinical Medicine and Diagnostics 2019, 9(2): 21-25 25 [12] Johson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place, social support and cardiovascular disease: a cross sectional study of a random sample of Swedish working population. Am J Public Health 1988; 78:1336-1342. [13] Lee CJ, Hsieh TT, Chiuk, Chen C, Lo LM Hunh TH. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia for Asian population. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2000; 2:327-333. [14] Mireles PC, Harlow SD, Carrilio CI, Nunenz RM. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia among working women in Mexico city. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology 2001; 15: 40-46. [15] Parmar MT, Solanki HM, Gosalia V. Study of risk factors of perinatal death in pregnancy induced hypertension. National journal of community medicine 2012; 3(4): 703-707. [16] Shazia Aftab, Jahan Ara, Sarah Kazi, Farah Deeba. Effects of poverty on pregnant women. Pak J Med Res 2012; 51: 12-20. [17] Furuta M, Salway S. Womens position within the household as determinant of Maternal Health Care Use in Nepal. International Family planning Perspectives 2006; 32(1): 17-27. [18] Sonia Hernandez-Dia, Sengwee Toh, Sven Cnattingius. Risk of pre-eclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies. Prospective cohort study BMJ 2009; 338: 41-50. [19] Trogstad L, Magnus P, Moffet A, Stoltenberg C et al. The effect of recurrent miscarriage and infertility on the risk of pre-eclampsia. B J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 116: 108-113. [20] Cassell KA, O’ Connell CM, Baskett TF. The origins and outcomes of triplet and quadruplet pregnancies in Nova Scotia, 1980 to 2001. Am J Perinatol 2004; 21:439-445. [21] Ness RB, Markovic N, Bass D, Harger D, Roberts JM. Family history of hypertension heart diseases and stroke among women who develop hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:1366-1371. [22] Sancheo Z SE, Zhang C, Qiu CF, Williams MA. Family history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in relation to pre-eclampsia risk. Hypertension 2003; 41: 408-413.

... pages left unread,continue reading

Document pages: 5 pages

Please select stars to rate!

         

0 comments Sign in to leave a comment.

    Data loading, please wait...
×