eduzhai > Physical Sciences > Materials Sciences >

Use the local clay of Nigeria to open the heat treatment refractory brick

  • sky
  • (0) Download
  • 20211030
  • Save
https://www.eduzhai.net International Journal of M aterials and Chemistry 2012, 2(5): 185-191 DOI: 10.5923/j.ijmc.20120205.01 Development of Heat Treatment Refractory Bricks Using Local Nigerian Clays Atanda. P1, Adeniji. O1, Oluwole. O2,* 1Department of M aterials Science and Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria 2Department of M echanical Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria Abstract This report presents a prelimnary investigation into the development of heat treat ment refractory bricks using two local Nigerian clays. Ten different sample co mpositions of two different clay deposits from Awo (Egbedore local Govern ment) and Ipetumodu (Ife No rth Local Govern ment) areas of Osun State, Nigeria, were collected and analysed. The effect of Port land cement on the refractory properties of the clays was studied. The sample mixes of the clay and West African Portland Cement were prepared in varying proportions. Physical and thermal property tests such as thermal shock, thermal conductivity, apparent porosity, shrinkage and cold crushing strength were carried out on the samples. The prelimnary results obtained showed that the sample co mposition containing between 20% and 30% West African Port land Cement (WAPCO) of both samples can be used for the manufacture of heat treatment furnaces bricks by blending the addition with more non-linear e xpansivity materia ls to increase therma l shock resistance. Keywords Heat Treat ment, Refractory Bricks, Cement, Local Clays 1. Introduction Refractories are mineral and chemical-based materials with very high heat-resisting properties, which make them ideal for use in the construction of oven and furnace walls, ceilings, and associated elements of iron and steel industry blast furnaces, glass manufacturing tanks, cement kilns, hot stoves, ceramic kilns, open hearth furnaces, nonferrous metallurg ical furnaces, and steam boilers[1]. Refractory materials can be made fro m clay refractory and non clay refractory. Non clay refractory are been made of alu mina, zirconia, silicon carbide, chro mia, magnesite, graphite and other less common materials, but the cost of these non-clay refractory is much higher than that of fire clay[2]. Most clay refractory p roducts are manufactured in the form of bricks, but refractory clay may also be formed into special shapes, such as the T-sections of refractory pipes or the small stands that support ceramic products during firing in a kiln[3]. Refractories have been an essential element in heat engineering plants since the 1960s, where they were successfu lly used to imp rove p erfo rmance and en ergy efficiency. This is because refractories are chemically and physically stable at high temperatures. Depending on the operating environment, refractories need to be resistant to thermal shock and be chemically inert[4]. Good fireclay refractories should always have 24-26% p lasticity and the * Corresponding author: leke_oluwole@yahoo.co.uk (Oluwole. O) Published online at https://www.eduzhai.net Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved shrinkage after firing should be within 6-8% maximu m. A good fireclay refractory should also not contain more than 25% Fe2O3. Because of the abundant supply of firec lay and its comparat ive cheapness, the refractory bricks made out of it are the most common and extensively used in all p laces of heat generation[5]. Fireclay bricks are used principally in furnace construction, to confine hot atmospheres and to thermally insulate structural members fro m excessive temperatures[4]. For fireclay brick, strength is not ordinarily an important consideration, because support of structural loads is usually not required. So me control is normally maintained over the dimensional accuracy and stability of the fin ished product. A group of refractory clays which can stand temperatures above Pyrometric Cone Equivalent (PCE) 19 are called fireclay. The clay which fuses below PCE 19 is not included under refractory. Fireclay is essentially of kaolinite group and has a composition similar to that of china-clay. In nature it is usually found to contain 24-32 per cent Al2O3, 50-60% SiO2 and LOI between 9 to 12%. Impu rit ies like o xides of calciu m, iron, titaniu m and magnesiu m and alkalies are invariably present, making it white, grey or b lack in colour[6]. St rict ly speaking, fireclay is of sedimentary orig in and mainly found in the coal measures, as bedded d ep os its [2]. Refractory material is a material that is not deformed or damaged by high temperatures. The term high temperatures is somewhat vague but usually means above about 1000℃ (1830 °F) or temperatures at which, because of melting or oxidation, the co mmon metals cannot be used. Refractory materials are usually non-metallic wh ich are used to make 186 Atanda. P et al.: Development of Heat Treatment Refractory Bricks Using Local Niger ian Clays crucibles, incinerators, insulation, and furnaces, particularly metallurg ical furnaces. Therefore, a refractory is a material that will retain its shape, strength and chemical identity when subjected to high temperatures and is used in applications that require extreme resistance to heat, such as furnace lin ings[7]. The oxides of alu min iu m (alu mina), silicon (silica) and magnesiu m (magnesia) are the most important materials used in the manufacturing of refractories. Another oxide usually found in refractories is the oxide of calciu m (lime). Fireclays are also widely used in the manufacture of refractories for high temperature heat furnace lin ings[8]. There are two co mmon forms of refractories, bricks and monolithics. Bricks (also known as fireclay b ricks) are pre-sintered forms which can hold their shape. Monolithics are loose material which can be formed into complex shapes, or sprayed into place, and have to be sintered before use. Castable refractory cement is also commonly used[9]. Develop ment of the above products can be produced from country’s vast natural resources (blessed with abundant clay deposit), wh ich is important as far as the industrializat ion of a nation and saving foreign exchange is concerned. Currently a lot of industries in Nigeria impo rt a lot of refractory related consumables on demand and specifications cannot be met locally. Based on the abundance of refractory brick raw materials in the country which can be deployed in the refractory industry, it is pertinent to develop and if possible to determine the viability of using locally sourced raw material in the country. 2. Experimental Procedure Table 1. Clay/Cement Mixtures using Ipetumodu Clay Ipetumodu Sample A1 B1 C1 D1 E1 F1 G1 H1 I1 Clay Composition(%) 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 Portland Cement 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Composition(%) Table 2. Clay/Cement Mixt ures for Awo Clay Awo Sample A2 B2 C2 D2 E2 F2 G2 H2 I2 Clay 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 Composition(%) Portland Cement 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Composition(%) The materials used during the course of the work were clay samples fro m Awo (Egbedore Local Govern ment Area of Osun State) and Ipetumodu (Ife North Local Govern ment area of Osun state)[10,11], both in Nigeria and Portland cement (fro m WAPCO Cement, Ewekoro, Ogun state, Nigeria)[12,13]. The clay samples used were obtained in lu mp forms, and were dried and grinded into powdery form. The samples were d ivided into ten equal parts of 1kg each in and labelled A1 to I1 for Ipetu modu samples and A2 to I2 for Awo samples (substrict 1 was used for Ipetumodu samples while substrict 2 was used for Awo samples). These ten different sample formations were obtained by varying the percentage of clay to Portland cement as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Each sample was hand rammed into rectangular metal mould to obtain the shape of the brick (fire clay) required. The mo ist samples were first allowed to dry at room temperature then sun dried and later furnace dried at a temperature of about 1000 ℃. The samples were subjected to standard refractory tests: thermal shock, thermal conductivity, shrinkage, apparent porosity, and cold crush strength tests. Thermal shock resistance The samples were gradually heated to a temperature of about 1000 ℃ in the furnace and soaked at this temperature for about 60 minutes. Samples were removed one after the other and dipped into non-flowing water at roo m temperature for about 60 seconds after which they were air-cooled for 5 minutes before being returned into the furnace at about 1000 ℃. Samp les were soaked for 15 minutes before plunging into water again. This cycle was repeated with the samples inspected each for appearance of crack after each cycle. The cycle was repeated ten times, after wh ich the bricks were assessed for appearance of cracks and degree of crack propagation. Thermal conducti vi ty It was determined by connecting two thermocouples to two different multi-meters and a hot plate. A hot plate supplied the necessary heat required and temperature readings were taken at both ends of the sample. The heat transfer equation (equation 1) was used to determine the conductivity of the brick. ???????????????? = ???????? ???????????????? (1) ???????? ???????????????? Where qx is the rate of heat flo w (heat flu x), A is the area of cross-section of the brick, x is the brick wall thickness, dt is the temperature d ifference across the brick wall and k is the thermal conductivity of the brick. Shrinkage property The shrinkage of the samples was measured by determining the cross sectional area before and after sun drying and firing. It was determined using equation (2): ????????ℎ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? = ????????ℎ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? × 100% .(2) ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? Apparent porosity This is the percentage change in volume of voids over the total volume of the sample. Weights of water-soaked samples and that of the oven-dried were taken. Equation 3 was used to estimate the apparent porosity. ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? = (????????1−????????0 )????????100% . (3) ????????0 where W0: weight of the oven dried sample and W1: weight of samp le soaked in water. The dried samples were we ighed to obtain W0 and the later immersed in water for 24 hours to obtain W1. Col d crush strength test The cold crushing strength of the samples was determined International Journal of M aterials and Chemistry 2012, 2(5): 185-191 187 by using an InstronR cold crusher connected to a computer. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Results Figure 1 shows the shrinkage properties of the Ipetumodu and Awo clays compared with standard shrinkage property. It was observed that the shrinkage properties of both mixes were comparable with standard shrinkage at about 20-25% cement content and decreasing until 40% cement content. Too much shrinkage of refractories will lead to spalling. Figure 2 shows the thermal conductivity of both clay mixes. There is an increasing trend with increasing cement addition. High thermal conductivity will lead to lower refracto r in es s . Shrinkage % (Awo) 30 Shrinkage % 25 (Ipetumodu) Standard sample 20 % shrinkage 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 % cement composition Figure 1. Shrinkage properties of the two samples compared with the standard sample. Thermal Conductivity W/m/K 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 5 10152025303540 % Cement composition Thermal conductivity(Awo sample) Thermal conductivity (Ipetumodu) Fi gure 2. Thermal Conduct ivit ies t est result for the t wo samples Figure 3 shows the temperature difference between the two ends of the samples during the therma l conductivity test. It could be seen that the 100% had lo w thermal conductivities. This is corroborated in Figure 2 as noted earlier. Figure 4 shows the thermal cycling test for the clay mixes. As noted earlier in the shrinkage properties plot, it was also seen here that the mixes with high shrinkage properties were susceptible to thermal shock. Thus increasing cement content increased resistance to thermal shock and hence therma l spalling. Figure 5 shows the apparent porosity decreasing with increasing ce ment content while Figure 6 shows compressive strength increasing with increasing cement content. Temperature (0k) 80 70 T1-T0 (0C) Awo 60 T1-T0 (0C)Ipetumodu 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 % cement Figure 3. T emperature-Cement composition test result of thetwo samples No of cycles 14 Number of cycle (Ipetumodu) 12 Number of cycle (Awo) 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 % Cement composition Figure 4. Thermal shock strength resistance graph for the two samples 25 Apparent porosity % 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Apparent porosity (%) Apparent porosity (%) % Cement composition % cement composition Figure 5. Apparent porosity test result for the two samples Strength (KN/mm) 14 Compressive strength at yield for Awo 12 sample (KN/mm2) 10 Compressive strength at yield for Ipetumodu sample (KN/mm2) 8 6 4 2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 % Cement composition Figure 6. Cold crushing strength test result of the two samples Figures7 to 16 show superimposed representative trend plots of important brick properties compared to each other in order to get a proper blend of properties fro m the bricks. 188 Atanda. P et al.: Development of Heat Treatment Refractory Bricks Using Local Niger ian Clays Figure 7 shows superimposed thermal conductivity and cold crushing strength values for the two mixes. Figure 8 shows thermal conductivity and thermal shock values superimposed on each other. Figure 9. apparent porosity and cold crushing strength variation with percentage cement composition Figure 7. Thermal conductivity and cold crushing strength properties variation with percentage cement composition Figure 10. Apparent porosity and thermal shock resistance properties variation with percentage cement composition Figure 8. Thermal conductivity and thermal shock properties variation with percentage cement composition Figure 9 shows apparent porosity and cold crushing strength superimposed on each other. It shows that as porosity is decreasing cold crushing strength increases. Figure 10 shows the superimposed plots of apparent porosity and no of cycles to therma l shock. This showed that as apparent porosity is decresing, resistance to thermal shock is increasing. Figure 11 presents the plots of apparent porosity and thermal conductivity. It showed that as porosity decreased, therma l conductiovity incresed. Figure 12 shows the suiperimposed plots of thermal shock and cold crushing strength. It showed that with increasing cold crusging strength, resistance to thermal shock increased. Figure 11. Apparent porosity and thermal conduictivity properties variation with percentages cement composition International Journal of M aterials and Chemistry 2012, 2(5): 185-191 189 Figure 15. Comparative plot of shrinkage and Apparent porosity propert ies with increasing cement cont ent Figure 12. Comparative plot of thermal shock resistance and cold crush strength variation with percentage cement composition Figure 16. Shrinkage and thermal shock resistance properties variation with increasing cement content Figure 13. Comparative plot of shrinkage and thermal conductivity variation with percentage cement composition Figure 13 shows the shrinkage and therma l conductivities superimposed on each other. It showed that as shrinkage decreased, thermal conductivity increased. Figure 14 shows shrinkage and cold crushing strength properties superimposed on each other. It showed that as shrinkage decreased, crushing strength increased. Figure 15 shows the shrinkage and porosity properties of the mould ing sand with increasing cement content. It shows that the porosity decreased with decreasing shrinkage. Figure 16 shows the shrinkage and thermal shock resistance properties variation with Increasing cement content. It shows that as shrinkage decreased, thermal shock resistance increased. This is also known as resistance to thermal spalling. 3.2. Discussion of Results Figure 14. Shrinkage and cold crush strength properties variation with percentage cement composition Fro m the the following facts could be deduced: Apparent Porosity Vs Shrinkage property As the percentage cement composition of the sample increased the porosity of the sample decreased. This can be adduced to the total volume of the pores in the samp le being closed up by the binding action of the increasing cement 190 Atanda. P et al.: Development of Heat Treatment Refractory Bricks Using Local Niger ian Clays content which caused more co mpaction. It was also seen that as porosity decreased, shrinkage decreased. The superimposed curves (Fig.15) show samp les containing 20-30% cement falling about a good range for shrinkage comparable with the standard in Fig.1. Lo w shrinkage is ideal for use in heat treat ment furnace. Apparent Porosity Vs Thermal Conducti vi ty Fig.11 shows decreasing therma l conductivity as porosity increases. As porosity increases, a refractory material is less resistant to the eroding action of penetrants. Also, the air pockets reduce thermal conductivity. On the other hand, refractory mate ria ls should have low therma l conductivities. If we strike a balance between these two properties following up fro m the porosity-shrinkage plot we would be able to see a good trend in samples containing 20-25% cement co mp o s itio n . Apparent porosity Vs Thermal shock As porosity increased, thermal shock decreased (Fig.10), following the same trend in the porosity-thermal conductivity plot. We could see the plots crossing about the 20-25% cement content. A refractory brick should not spall under rapid temperature changes. Apparent porosity Vs Col d Crush strength The porosity- cold crushing strength plot (Fig.9) fo llo wed the same trend as the porosity-thermal shock plot. If we interpolate the porosity percentage we obtained from the porosity-shrinkage plot we could see cement contents of 20-25% being quite acceptable. The cold-crush strength is 7 KN is quite acceptable especially as the refractory is not expected to be under such heavy loads. Shrinkage Vs Thermal conducti vi ty This comb ination has already been treated in separate sections above in relation to porosity but we can observe in Fig.13 that at the cement composition range of 20-25%, the therma l conductivity has not started rising so high and at the same time shrinkage is quite low co mparative to the standard in Fig.1. Shrinkage Vs Thermal Shock Resistance This plot(Fig.16) also shows clearly that at 20-30% cement input, the thermal shock is about 19-20 cycles wh ile the shrinkage is kept min imal to avoid spalling. A high thermal shock and minimu m shrin kage are needed for a good refractory brick that must be used in heat treatment furnaces. Shrinkage Vs Col d Crush strength properties The ability to withstand cold crush increases as the composition of the cement of each sample is increased, the shrinkage property reducing at the same time (Fig.14). The optimu m balance was achieved with samp le of 20-30% cement co mposition. Thermal conducti vi ty Vs Thermal Shock Thermal shock increased with increasing thermal conductivity (Fig.8). Thermal shock of a refractory material must be h igh to withstand a high changes in the operating temperature of the furnace. Hence, a material to be selected must have a high thermal shock and a low thermal conductivity. The balance in the properties is essential for the proper functioning of a good refractory heat treatment furnace. The samples with 20-30% cement content were observed to fit in to this category. Thermal Shock resistance Vs col d crush strength High thermal shock resistance and high cold crush strength is required for a material to be suitable for use in heat treatment furnace. The reason is that refractories are subject to high change in temperature and they must be of adequate strength to support the furnace wall they are used for. Fig.12 shows a very close trend in the two superimposed plots of increasing property with increasing cement content. Thermal conducti vi ty Vs Col d crush strength Fig.7 shows the increasing trend in these two properties with increasing cement content. This p lot is a b it easier to decipher where a steady increase is and a steep increase in thermal conductivity as opposed to the thermal-shock –cold crushing strength plot. A slight slope could be observed up till 25% cement content and after 30% a steeper rise in thermal conductivity could be observed. Samp les not above 25% ce ment content would be preferable as refractory would be needed than a bogus one. A refractory should have low thermal conductivity and high strength to withstand the condition they will be subjected to in service condition. The samples that can be chosen in the case for the balance of the required properties are samples with 20-30% cement co mp o s itio n . 4. Conclusions With the results obtained, it could be concluded that, there is a range of co mpositions that is suitable for the manufacture of heat treatment refractory bricks within the refractory brick composition selected. The sample compositions containing between 20 - 30% Portland cement and 70 - 80% clay of either Awo or Ipetumodu would serve well for heat treat ment furnaces due to their light weight, moderate porosity, minimu m shrinkage and mediu m strength with additions of non-linear expansivity materials to increase thermal shock res is tan ce. REFERENCES [1] Wikepedia( assessed Feb. 2009) ‘ Clay’ http://en.wikipedia. org/wik i/Cl ay [2] Bricks(assessed Feb. 2004)‘Bricks’ Http://www.bricks. com/docu ment s [3] Campbell, J. W. P., and Pryce.W (2003), ‘Bricks: a world history’, Thanes & Hudson, New York. [4] Atanda, P. O., and Imasogie, B. I. (2009) Development of an Integrated Salt Bath Isothermal Heat Furnace unit for Austempering of Ductile Iron. Ph.D. Thesis Submmitted to the Department of M aterials Science and Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife. Nigeria. [5] Scaffer E. and James, P. (1995), The Science and Design of International Journal of M aterials and Chemistry 2012, 2(5): 185-191 191 Engineering M aterials, 1st ed., Longman, London. [6] Azom.com (2007) ‘The A to Z of M aterials’ http://www. azom.com [7] M arkov, B. and Krivandin, V. (1980), M etallurgical Furnaces, 1st Ed. M ir. Publisher, M oscow. [8] Khana, O. P. (2005), A Textbook of M aterials Science and M etallurgy, Dhanpat Rai Publication (P) Ltd. New Delhi, India. [9] Darnay, H, Bowen.K and Uhlmann, D. R. (1976), Introduction to Ceramics, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York. [10] Ibitoye, S.A and Afonja, A.A (1997a) “ Adaptation of Ipetumodu potter’s clay to foundry use:1. M oulding properties of as mined and silica mixed potter’s clay.” Ife Journal of Technology,7(1):17-22 [11] Ibitoye, S.A and Afonja, A.A (1997b) “Adaptation of Ipetumodu potter’s clay to foundry use:2.Development of potter’s clay bound synthetic moulding sand.” Ife Journal of Technology, 7(1):39-45 [12] Adamu,M .A(2012), Effect of Different Inhibitors on the Corrosion of a M edium Carbon Steel in Seawater and Cassava fluid’ M Sc Thesis, Department of M aterials Science and Engineering. Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-ife, Niger ia. [13] Wikepedia(assessed M ay. 2012) ‘Portland Cement’ http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Portland Cement

... pages left unread,continue reading

Document pages: 7 pages

Please select stars to rate!

         

0 comments Sign in to leave a comment.

    Data loading, please wait...
×