eduzhai > Physical Sciences > Materials Sciences >

Corrosion inhibition of methyl red (2,4-dimethylamino-2 '- carboxyazobenzene) on low carbon steel in alkaline medium

  • sky
  • (0) Download
  • 20211030
  • Save
https://www.eduzhai.net American Journal of Materials Science 2014, 4(2): 111-117 DOI: 10.5923/j.materials.20140402.08 Inhibitive Behaviour of Methyl Red (2, 4-Dimethylamino-2'-carboxylazobenzene) on Corrosion of Mild Steel in Alkaline Medium S. I. Durowaye1,*, O. I. Sekunowo1, V. O. Durowaye2 1Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria 2Department of Chemistry, International School, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria Abstract The corrosive behaviour of mild steel in 1M NaOH solutions contaminated with methyl red (2, 4-Dimethylamino-2'-carboxylazobenzene), an organic compound at room temperature was studied using the weight loss technique. The concentration of the methyl red was varied as 1.0%, 2.0%, 3.0%, 4.0%, 5.0% and 6% weight of each alkaline medium and their effects were carefully studied on the corrosion rate of mild steel. The results obtained showed methyl red to be an efficient inhibitor in the alkaline environment with general decrease in corrosion rate as the concentration of the organic compound increases. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm was found to be the best description of the adsorption behaviour of Methyl red on the mild steel surface. Keywords Corrosion, Mild Steel, Methyl Red, NaOH, Optical Emission Spectrometer 1. Introduction Metallic material constitutes a great part of construction material elements in industries, agricultural equipment, oil and gas and petrochemical, medical services, process and allied industries. In these industries, the metallic material as a result of interaction with its environment loses its integrity over a period of time [1]. As such, the material cannot perform the intended function effectively and reliably. Some of these environments are atmosphere, aqueous solution, solids, acids and bases, inorganic solvents, molten salts, liquid metals, human body etc. At times, the effect of the loss in integrity may be very severe as to result in loss of valuable production time, accident and in the extreme death. The cost associated with the problem is enormous and its influence in the economy life of a nation is significant. It has been estimated that approximately 5% of industrialised nations’ income is spent on corrosion incidental problems. For instance, the cost of the problem to the U.S. economy is put at $297 billion [2]. The cost to the Nigeria economy is not available. However, a guess could be haphazard; and this is in the corridor of $3.2 billion [3]. In frequent instances the addition of small quantities of special chemicals to large volumes of corrosive solutions can be quite effective in reducing corrosion. Such chemicals are * Corresponding author: durosteve02@yahoo.com (S. I. Durowaye) Published online at https://www.eduzhai.net Copyright © 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved called corrosion inhibitors. At the simplest level a corrosion inhibitor is a substance which when added in small concentration to an environment effectively reduces the corrosion rate of a metal exposed to that environment. Because of the toxic nature and high cost of some chemicals used like chromate and nitrate, it is necessary to develop environmentally acceptable and less expensive inhibitors [4]. Organic inhibitors in particular are of great use in the control of corrosion in sea water. Mild steel corrosion in acidic solution has also been effectively controlled by the use of organic substances containing nitrogen, oxygen or sulphur in the conjugated system as inhibitors [5]. Successful use of naturally occurring inhibitors in both acidic and alkaline environments has been extensively reported [6]. This method of corrosion control is fraught with the challenges of high cost and toxicity. The efficiency of several synthetic organic compounds such as methylsulfiny, carbanion-dimethyl sulfoxide, hydroxyl radicals and alkyl nitrates has been investigated [7]. Corrosion mitigation of structures by these synthetic compounds is significant. However, the known hazardous effects of most synthetic organic inhibitors still pose a great challenge. Most of the efficient inhibitors used in industry are organic compounds having multiple bonds in their molecules which mainly contain nitrogen and sulphur atoms through which they are adsorbed on the metal surface. Compounds with functional groups containing oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur have ability to form complexes with iron. They have been reported to act as effective inhibitors to the surface of steel by means of their competitive adsorption through the surface complex formation [8]. 112 S. I. Durowaye et al.: Inhibitive Behaviour of Methyl Red (2, 4-Dimethylamino -2'-carboxylazobenzene) on Corrosion of Mild Steel in Alkaline Medium Organic compounds used as inhibitors act through a process of surface adsorption, so the efficiency of an inhibitor depends on (i) the chemical structure of the organic compound, (ii) the surface charge of the metal, and (iii) the type of interactions between the organic molecule and metal surface. Existing data reveal most inhibitors to act by adsorption on the metal surface through heteroatoms such as nitrogen, oxygen and sulphur, double bonds, triple bonds or aromatic rings which tend to form stronger coordination bonds. Compounds with π-bonds generally exhibit good inhibitive properties, the electrons for the surface interaction being provided by the π-orbital [9]. The corrosion inhibition of steels has received a considerable amount of attention as a result of its industrial concern [10, 11]. Steel passivation in alkaline environments is due to the formation of a very thin, but highly protective oxide/hydroxide layer [12]. It has been proved that, in alkaline media, the film corresponds basically to a double-layer model consisting of an inner magnetite and an outer ferric oxide according to a Fe3O4/ Fe3+ structure [13 – 19]. The most internal layer is composed of Fe2+ oxides in contact with the substrate. The thermodynamic instability of both Fe2+ oxides and magnetite in the presence of oxygen leads to the formation of an outer layer of Fe3+ oxides and continuous exposure to oxygen and humidity promotes film growth and a progressive enrichment of the passive film in Fe3+, either in oxide form or oxo-hydroxide form, depending on the potential. The passivity breakdown occurs by addition of Cl- to the alkaline solution [20]. In practice, corrosion can never be stopped but can be hindered to a reasonable level. Among many methods of corrosion control and prevention, the use of organic inhibitors is the most frequently used. Corrosion control is an important activity of technical, economical and environmental importance. Thus, the search for efficient corrosion inhibitors has become a necessity to secure metallic materials against unmitigated degradation. Corrosion of mild steel is of great practical interest because mild steel is widely used in the oil, gas and offshore environments for pipelines, flow-lines, platforms, down-hole tubular equipments, well heads, industrial vessels etc. Corrosion inhibition is being extensively employed in minimising metallic wastage of engineering materials in service [21]. In this research, the effect of the inhibition efficiency of methyl red on the corrosion of mild steel in alkaline medium using 1M sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH) is experimentally investigated and presented. 2. Experimental Details 2.1. Work Materials and Specimen Preparation The cylindrical mild steel rod used for this study was obtained in the open market and analysed at the Research Laboratory, Department of Metallurgical & Materials Engineering, University of Lagos, Akoka, Nigeria. It was cut to a length of 30cm and properly machined to diameter 15mm. It was manually polished using silicon carbide grinding papers of grit 60 and 120 to ensure a smooth surface and reduce corrosion attack on the specimen. After polishing, the rod was cut into lengths of 5.25cm and the edges of these cut pieces were also polished. The rods were kept in a desiccator to prevent corrosion prior to experimentation. Seven specimens of length 5.25cm and diameter 15mm were used for the experiment and were denoted as A, B, C, D, E, F and G. 2.2. Inhibitor and Alkaline Methyl Red (2, 4-Dimethylamino-2'-carboxylazobenzene), a reddish powder is the inhibitor used. Its structural formula is shown in figure 1 and its molecular formula is C15H15N3O2. It was prepared by dissolving 0.1g of Methyl red in 75ml of 95% ethanol and distilled water was added to make 100 ml. Various concentrations of 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5% and 6% weight of each alkaline medium were used as the inhibiting compound. 40g of NaOH was dissolved in 1000cm3 of distilled water to get 1M NaOH. The NaOH used as corrosive medium was from Analar grade and bi-distilled water was used for its preparation. Figure 1. Chemical structure of Methyl Red (2, 4-Dimethylamino-2'-carboxylazobenzene) Table 1. Spectrometric Compositional Analysis of Specimen Elements Composition (Wt. %) C Si Mn P S Cr Mo V Ni Cu Al 0.278 0.210 0.870 0.030 0.040 0.118 0.018 0.008 0.079 0.044 0.003 Fe 98.350 American Journal of Materials Science 2014, 4(2): 111-117 113 2.3. Test Procedures A = Total surface area of specimen in cm2. The composition analysis of the specimen was determined using an optical emission spectrometer (OES) ARL 3460B model and the chemical composition is shown in table 1. The specimens were degreased in ethanol, air dried and etched in 5% concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl) for 30 seconds and weighed using an analytical balance. The weight loss was T = Total time sample was immersed in hours. D = Density of the specimen in g/cm3. R = Corrosion rate in millimeters per year. The specimens used have cylindrical geometry and each has a total surface area given by: A = 2πr(l + r) (2) determined by weighting the cleaned samples before and after hanging the sample into 100 ml of corrosive solution in the absence and presence of various concentrations of the inhibitor. The initial weights were recorded as W1 before immersion in the test environments. Specimens A, B, C, D, E, F and G were immersed in seven separate 150 ml open beakers containing 100 ml of 1M NaOH. The inhibitor (Methyl red) under test was mixed with the NaOH solutions in percentage concentrations of 0% (control), 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5% and 6% respectively of the total mixture. The experiment was allowed to run for twenty one days with periodic measurement of weight loss every 72 hours. The specimens were removed from the beakers and scrubbed with a bristle brush, rinsed in distilled water, rinsed in alcohol, air-dried and re-weighed to get the final weight and recorded as W2. The weight loss (WL) was calculated in gramme (g) as the difference between the initial weight and the final weight after removal of the corrosion products. The reduction of the thickness as a function of time was calculated. The experimental readings were recorded to the Where; l = length of specimen in cm. r = radius of specimen in cm. Curves of corrosion rate (calculated) versus time of immersion were also plotted. The percentage inhibitor efficiency, P, was calculated from the equation: P = R1− R2 X 100 (3) R1 where V1 and V2 are the corrosion rates in the absence and the presence respectively, of a predetermined concentration of inhibitor. The percentage inhibitor efficiency was calculated for all the inhibitors throughout the exposure period. The degree of surface coverage (Ɵ) was calculated from equation: Ɵ = R 1−R 2 R1 (4) The area and density of the specimen used are 28.28cm2 and 7.86g/cm3. nearest 0.0001g on a Mettler digital analytical balance (digital analytical balance with sensitivity of ± 1mg. The tests without inhibitors were done for comparison with the tests in inhibited environments to observe the corrosion reactions behaviour of the tested specimens. The corrosion rate (R) in millimeters per year was evaluated using the formula proposed by Krisher [22] Corrosion rate R = 87.6W (1) DAT 3. Results and Discussion The spectrochemical analysis shown in table 1 reveals that the mild steel specimens used in this study have an iron content of approximately 99% with other trace elements residued from metal extraction process. The levels of these trace elements are insignificant to influence the chemistry of the behaviour of the steel specimens in the corrosive Where: W = Weight loss = Initial weight (W1) – Final weight (W2) in milligrams. medium. Table 2. Weight losses, WL in 0% - 6% concentration of Methyl Red in 1M NaOH at every 72hrs for 504hrs Specimen A B C D E F G Inhibitor Concentration, C (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 72 hrs WL (g) 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 144 hrs WL (g) 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.01 216 hrs 288 hrs WL (g) WL (g) 0.20 0.35 0.08 0.14 0.08 0.12 0.06 0.10 0.08 0.10 0.04 0.07 0.01 0.04 360 hrs WL (g) 0.50 0.22 0.18 0.13 0.14 0.09 0.07 432 hrs WL (g) 504 hrs WL (g) 0.63 0.78 0.27 0.33 0.25 0.31 0.18 0.22 0.17 0.18 0.11 0.13 0.09 0.11 114 S. I. Durowaye et al.: Inhibitive Behaviour of Methyl Red (2, 4-Dimethylamino -2'-carboxylazobenzene) on Corrosion of Mild Steel in Alkaline Medium Table 3. Weight losses, WL in 0% - 6% concentration of Methyl Red in 1M NaOH at 504hrs Specimen A B C D E F G Inhibitor Concentration, C (%) W1(g) W2 (g) WL (g) 0 30.64 29.86 0.78 1 30.94 30.61 0.33 2 30.49 30.18 0.31 3 30.47 30.25 0.22 4 31.88 31.70 0.18 5 30.94 30.81 0.13 6 32.24 32.13 0.11 Table 4. Inhibition efficiency and surface coverage of Methyl Red on mild steel at 504 hrs Specimen Inhibitor Concentration, C (%) A 0 B 1 C 2 D 3 E 4 F 5 G 6 Corrosion Rate (mpy) 0.610 0.258 0.242 0.172 0.141 0.102 0.086 Inhibition Efficiency (1%) 0 57.7 60.3 71.8 76.9 83.3 85.9 Surface Coverage (Ɵ) 0 0.577 0.603 0.718 0.769 0.833 0.859 Weightt Loss (g) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 70 170 270 370 470 570 Exposure Time (hrs) 0% Methyl Red 2% Methyl Red 4% Methyl Red 5% Methyl Red 6% Methyl Red Figure 2. Variation of weight-loss with exposure time for specimens A, C, E, F & G in 0%, 2%, 4%, 5% & 6% Methyl red concentrations Corrosion Rate (mpy) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 70 0% Methyl Red 2% Methyl Red 4% Methyl Red 5% Methyl Red 6% Methyl Red 170 270 370 470 570 Exposure Time (hrs) Figure 3. Effect of percentage concentration of Methyl red on the corrosion rate of mild steel specimen A, C, E, F & G American Journal of Materials Science 2014, 4(2): 111-117 115 Inhibition Efficiency (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Inhibitor Concentration (%) 0.08 Figure 4. Variation of percentage inhibition efficiency with Methyl red at concentrations at 504 hrs 0.07 0.06 0.05 C/Ɵ 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 Inhibitor Concentration, C Figure 5. Langmuir isotherm adsorption model on the Mild steel surface in 1M NaOH solution containing different concentrations of inhibitor at 504 hrs The weight-loss of mild steel was studied at various time intervals from 72 hrs to 540 hrs in the absence (control) and presence of stated concentrations of Methyl red in 1M NaOH. The values of weight-loss (WL), corrosion rate (R) and the percentage inhibition efficiency and surface coverage are presented in Tables 2, 3 and 4. Figures 2 & 3 show the variation of weight-loss and corrosion rate with exposure time at the various inhibitor (Methyl red) concentrations, while Fig. 4 shows the variation of percentage inhibition efficiency with inhibitor concentration. Weight loss and corrosion rate in specimen A to which no inhibitor was added (control) were the highest. The specimen corroded in the solution (control) by an electrochemical mechanism involving its oxidation as ions according to: Fe → Fe2++ 2e– (5) The excess electrons generated in the aqueous solution created hydroxyl ions [OH–] by the reduction of dissolved oxygen according to: O2 + 2H2O + 4e– → 4OH– (6) Fe2+ + 2OH– → Fe(OH)2 (7) The reaction continues as the Fe(OH)2 reacts with oxygen which enhances uniform corrosion at the cathodic site on the specimen’s surface according to: O2 + 2H2O + 4e– → 4OH– (8) The corrosion rate of the specimen is associated with the flow of electrons with the two reactions involving oxidation (in which the specimen ionised) and reduction occurring at the anodic and cathodic sites respectively, on the surface of the specimen. Generally, the specimen’s surface consists of both anodic and cathodic sites, depending on segregation, microstructure, stress, etc [23]. Specimen G to which the highest concentration of the inhibitor was added had the lowest weight loss and corrosion rate. The corrosion rate decreased drastically with increase in Methyl red concentrations due to the interaction of inhibitor molecules with the steel surface. The weight-loss measurements are not linearly proportional to the value of Methyl red concentration most probably due to formation of a protective film which prevents the diffusion of the harmful anions onto the steel irrespective of its concentration for specimens B, C, D, E, F and G. It could be seen that increase in the 116 S. I. Durowaye et al.: Inhibitive Behaviour of Methyl Red (2, 4-Dimethylamino -2'-carboxylazobenzene) on Corrosion of Mild Steel in Alkaline Medium concentration of Methyl red resulted in increased inhibition efficiency. The highest inhibition efficiency of 85.9% was observed to occur with addition of 6% concentration of Methyl red. This behaviour suggests that the inhibition is due to the adsorption of inhibitor’s molecule onto the specimen’s surfaces and Methyl red acts as an adsorption inhibitor. The inhibition action of Methyl red is ascribed to the presence of heteroatoms in this compound. Organic compounds that contain functional groups such as –OR, -NR2 and/or –SR have been reported to inhibit corrosion of metals in alkaline or acidic solutions [24, 25]. In solutions containing specimens B, C, D, E, F and G, competitive adsorption is assumed to occur on the specimens’ surface between the aggressive OH- ions and the anions of the inhibitor molecules [26]. The inhibitor molecules are first absorbed on the specimens’ surfaces and therefore impede corrosion by blocking the reaction sites of the specimens’ surfaces. In this way, the surface area available for the aggressive OH- ions attack is reduced. The curves obtained indicate similar electrochemical reactions with the addition of Methyl red. A higher coverage of the inhibitor on the surface was obtained in solutions with higher inhibitor concentration. The formation of surface inhibitor film on the mild steel surface provides protection to the mild steel against corrosion. This film reduces the active surface area exposed to the corrosive medium and delays the iron dissolution [27]. The observed phenomenon is generally described as the corrosion inhibition of the metal with the formation of a protective layer of adsorbed species at the metal surface. In the presence of Methyl red, corrosion is inhibited by adsorption of the organic molecules on the metal surface. For an inhibitor to have a high coverage on the surface, a chemical bond between the inhibitor and the metal atom stronger than the one for water molecules should be formed. The adsorption of corrosion inhibitors at the metal/solution interface is due to the formation of either electrostatic or covalent bonding between the adsorbates and the metal surface atoms. To determine the inhibiting properties and the behaviour of the Methyl red molecules adsorbed on the metallic surfaces, it is preferable to suppose that physiochemical reaction is responsible for the main inhibiting effect. Thus, it is a good inhibitor for iron. Furthermore, it is well known that iron corrosion inhibition by organic compounds, particularly those presenting p-bonding, is favoured whenever a strong adsorption process takes place on the metal surface [28]. The nature of inhibitor interaction on the corroding surface during corrosion inhibition of metals and alloys has been deduced in terms of adsorption characteristics of the inhibitor. The adsorption behaviour of the inhibitor molecules on the metal surface can be applied to explain the inhibition mechanism of inhibitors [29, 30]. Several adsorption isotherms can be used to assess the adsorption behaviour of the inhibitor. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm was found to be the best description of the adsorption behaviour of Methyl red on the mild steel surface, which obeys the following equations [31, 32]. ???????? = ???????????????? 1+???????????????? (9) Re-arranging, ???????? ???????? = ???????? + 1 ???????? (10) where C is the inhibitor concentration, K is the adsorption equilibrium constant, and θ the surface coverage of the inhibitor. The linear relationship of C/θ versus C in different concentration of Methyl red solutions is displayed in Figure 5. However, the slope of the relation shows a little deviation from unity, this might be the result from the interactions between the adsorbed species on the metal surface [33, 34]. The K value may be taken as a measure of the strength of the adsorption forces between the inhibitor molecules and the metal surface [35]. 4. Conclusions In this study, the weight loss technique reveals Methyl red to be an efficient inhibitor for mild steel in the sodium hydroxide corrosive medium. The inhibition efficiency increases with the increase in concentration of Methyl red with maximum inhibition efficiency value of 85.9% at 6% inhibitor concentration. At this value, the lowest corrosion rate value of 0.086 mpy was obtained. This is a mixed type inhibitor whose adsorption on mild steel is physiochemical. It mainly acts by film formation, thus blocking the active sites on the cathodic and anodic regions. The adsorption of this inhibitor obeys Langmuir’s adsorption isotherm. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Professor G.I. Lawal, Head of Department, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Dept, University of Lagos for his tremendous support and Mr. B.M. Begusa, Former Chief Technologist, Chemistry Department, University of Lagos, for his valuable suggestions. REFERENCES [1] Callister, W.D., Materials Science and Engineering, 4th ed. John – Wiley, New York, 1997. [2] www.nace.org retrieved Friday July 6, 2007 [3] CIA-TheWorldfactbook-Nigeria,www.cia.gov/cia/publicatio ns/factbook/geos/ni.html. July 2006 [4] Abiola O.K. and Oforka N.C, (2002), “Inhibition of the Corrosion of Mild Steel in Hydrochloric Acid by (4- Amino – 2 –Methyl-5-Pyrimidinyl Methylthio) Acetic Acid and its Precursor”, Journal of Corrosion Science and Engineering, vol 3, Pages 1-8. [5] A.O. James, N.C. Okafor and O.K. Abiola (2007): ‘‘Inhibition of Acid Corrosion of Mild Steel by Pyridoxol American Journal of Materials Science 2014, 4(2): 111-117 117 hydrochlorides’’. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, Serbia, 1: 80–91. [6] W. Jiang, M. Gong and J. Zhao (2007): ‘‘Progress of research on green corrosion inhibitors extracted from natural plants’’. Corrosion Science and protection Technology, China 9 (4) 0278. [7] A.S. Ekop, N.O. Eddy (2008): ‘‘Inhibitive and Adsorptive Properties of Orphenadrine for the Corrosion of Mild Steel in H2SO4’’. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2(4): 1258-1263. [8] S.M. Abd El Haleem, S. Abd El Wanees, E.E. Abd El Aal, A. Diab, Corrosion Sci. 52 (2010) 292. [9] Ü. Ergun, D. Yüzer, K.C. Emregül, Mat. Chem. and Phy 109 (2008) 492. [10] E. Sarmiento, J. G. González-Rodriguez, J. Uruchurtu, O.Sarmiento, M. Menchaca, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 4(2009)134. [11] Yanyan Yang, Lifen Xiao, Yanqiang Zhao and Fengyun Wang, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 3(2008)56. [12] L. Freirea, X.R. Nóvoaa, M.F. Montemorb, M.J. Carmezimb, Mat. Chem. and Phy. 114 (2009) 962. [13] M. Nagayama, M. Cohen, J. Electrochem. Soc. 109 (1962) 781. [14] D. Rahner, Sol. State Ionics 86–88 (1996) 865. [15] K. Yazdanfar, X. Zhang, P.G. Keech, D.W. Shoesmith, J.C. Wren, Corrosion Sci. 52(2010) 1297. [16] B. Macdugall, M.J. Graham, Growth and stability of passive films, in: P. Marcus, J. Oudars (Eds.), Corrosion Mechanisms in Theory and Practice, Marcee Decker Pub., NY, 1995, p. 143. [17] S. Joiret, M. Keddam, X.R. Nóvoa, M.C. Pérez, C. Rangel, H. Takenouti, Cem. Concr. Compos. 24 (2002) 7. [18] Aver, S.H. (1974): ‘‘The Introduction to Physical Metallurgy’’. 2nd Edition McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, pp. 86-92. [19] D. D. N. Singh, Rita Ghosh, B. K. Singh, Corrosion Sci.44 (2002)1713. [20] D.D. Macdonald, Pure Appl. Chem. 71 (1999) 951. [21] A.J. Davenport, L.J. Oblonsky, M.P. Ryan, M.F. Toney, J. Electrochem. Soc. 147 (2000) 2162. [22] Krisher, A. S. (2006): ‘‘Technical Information Regarding Coupon Testing in Metal Samples Corrosion Monitoring Systems’’. Retrieved from www.aispi.com/cpntst.htm, 2006. [23] Smallman, R.E; Bishop, R.J. ‘‘Modern Physical Metallurgy and Materials Engineering’’. Sixth edition, 1999. ISBN 0 7506 4564 4. [24] V. Jovancievic, B. Yang, J. O’M Bockris, J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 94 (1988) [25] L. Narvaez, E. Cano, D.M. Bastidas, J. Appl. Electrochem. 35, 499–506 (2005) [26] U. Retter, A. Widmann, K. Siegler, H. Kahlert, J. Electroanal. Chem. 546 (2003) 87. [27] R.T. Loto (2013): ‘‘Corrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel in acidic medium by butyl alcohol’’. Res Chem Intermed DOI 10.1007/s11164 – 013 – 1088 – 1. [28] Li, X; Deng, S and Fu, H (2010): ‘‘Adsorption and Inhibition effect of Vanillin on Cold Rolled Steel in 3M H3PO4’’. Progress in Organic Coatings 67, 420 – 426. [29] P, Singh, P; Bhara, K and Singh, G (2008): ‘‘Adsorption and Kinetics Studies of Leucine as an Inhibitor on Mild Steel in Acidic Media’’. Applied Surface 254, 5927 – 5935. [30] W.H. Durnie, B.J. Kinsella, R. deMarco, A. Jefferson, J. Appl. Electrochem. 31, 1221–1226 (2001) [31] Y.H. Tang, W.Z. Yang, X.S. Yin, Y. Liu, R. Wan, J.T. Wang, Mater. Chem. Phys. 116, 479–483 (2009). [32] M.S. Morad, J. Appl. Electrochem. 38, 1509–1518 (2008). [33] A. Azim, L.A. Shalaby, H. Abbas, Corros. Sci. 14 (1974) 21. [34] M.A. Migahed, H.M. Mohamed, A.M. Al-Sabagh, Mater. Chem. Phys. 80 (2003) 169. [35] M.A. Amin, Applied Electrochem. 36 (2006) 215.

... pages left unread,continue reading

Document pages: 7 pages

Please select stars to rate!

         

0 comments Sign in to leave a comment.

    Data loading, please wait...
×