eduzhai > Life Sciences > Agricultural >

Crop water demand of Maize (Zea mays L.) in medium permeable soil in coastal plain sandy land

  • sky
  • (0) Download
  • 20211030
  • Save
https://www.eduzhai.net International Journal of Plant Research 2019, 9(1): 1-7 DOI: 10.5923/j.plant.20190901.01 Crop Water Requirements during Growth Period of Maize (Zea mays L.) in a Moderate Permeability Soil on Coastal Plain Sands Bassey E. Udom*, Onyinyechi J. Kamalu Department of Crop and Soil Science, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria Abstract Water requirement in a cropped field can be measured directly with tensiometers or neutron probe method or it can be estimated from meteorological data by means of empirical formulae. A field experiment was carried out at the University of Port Harcourt to determine the pattern of water used by maize crop during the growth period, calculated by the Blaney-Criddle and Standard Class A Pan Evaporation data. Results showed that total crop water requirement during the growing season was 456.9 mm, with mean daily consumptive used rate of 4.22 mm and 3.91 mm using the Blaney-Criddle and Pan Evaporation data. Peak period of water used by the crop was found at tasseling (5.66 mm day-1), and during yield formation period (6.31 mm day-1), calculated with the Blaney-Criddle, 5.03 mm day-1 and 4.78 mm day-1 respectively with pan evaporation data. The functional model: Y = 12.04 + 1.617x, R2 = 0.604 for leaf area index (LAI) and Y = 22.01 + 0.914x, R2 = 0.620 for plant height can be used to predict water used by the plant. Sand content tended to increase the amount of water used by the plant while clay content showed non-significant negative effect on water used by the crop. Therefore, both the Blaney-Criddle and Pan Evaporation formulae can be used to estimate the amount of water used by the crop in the study area and similar areas in the humid tropics. Keywords Water use, Growth period, Leaf area index, Sandy loam soil, Blaney-Criddle, Pan Evaporation 1. Introduction Water as an environmental variable has received and will continue to receive major attention in the global need to increase food production. The pattern of crop-water requirement is of agronomic and economic importance, particularly where water is a scarce resource. In recent times, there is competition for water among the municipal, industrial and agricultural users (Hamdy et al., 2003). Therefore, estimating water use of crops accurately is important for crop planning, scheduling, management and productivity (Michael, 2009; Barhom, 2012). Crop water requirement is the measure of the amount of water required for evapotranspiration, when sufficient soil water is maintained by precipitation and/or irrigation so that it doesn't restrain plant development and yield (Djaman et al., 2017). Consumptive water use pattern in a cropped field can be quantified by the use of a water balance, which is the computation of all water fluxes at the boundaries of the * Corresponding author: ebassidy@yahoo.com (Bassey E. Udom) Published online at https://www.eduzhai.net Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ system under consideration (Varga et al., 2013, Gicheru et al., 2004). At the soil surface boundary, rainfall (P) and irrigation (I) are considered gains; evapotranspiration (ET), deep percolation (Ql), and the run-off (R) are losses (Reichardt et al., 2012). The water balance gives an important overview of the water regime and is an essential tool for effective crop management. Soil water balance is related to the moisture by precipitation and/or irrigation to that lost through evaporation, overland flow and deep drainage. The amount of water required for maize (or any other crop) depends on the duration of growth and development stages of the crop, the evaporative demand of the environment, and expansion of canopy, crop species and planting density (Wright and Bell, 1992). On sandy soils with low water storage capacity in the same climate, more water would be needed to maintain adequate moisture in the root zone for crop uptake. Moisture stress during the period beginning approximately at tasseling and through cob setting/cob filling could have adverse effect on optimum yield of maize (Nageswara et al., 1989). If the root zone is lacking sufficient water, many cobs will be empty or will contain only a few grains. Therefore water use pattern during the growth stages of the crop would enable one to match the peak period of water needs of the plant. 2 Bassey E. Udom and Onyinyechi J. Kamalu: Crop Water Requirements during Growth Period of Maize (Zea mays L.) in a Moderate Permeability Soil on Coastal Plain Sands Water use for a crop can be estimated if water supplied by rainfall and/or irrigation, the amount used by the crop in evapotranspiration, the change in soil moisture storage and the amount lost by deep percolation are known (Olasantan, 2008). The amount used by the crop in evapotranspiration can be measured with Tensiometers or by Neutron Probe method directly in the field or from meteorological data by means of empirical formulae (McVicar et al., 2005). The daily soil water balance equation is written in the form of: ???????????????? = ???????????????? − ???????????????????????? − ???????????????????????? − ???????????????? (1) where Rn, AEn, Ron, Dn and Mn represent the amount of rainfall, actual evaporation, surface run-off, deep percolation, and change in soil moisture storage respectively (Allen et al., 1998). The equation can also be written as: ???????? + ???????? − ???????????????? ± ???????? ± ???????????????? = ∆???????? (2) where P, I, ET, R, QL, ∆S represent total precipitation, irrigation, evapotranspiration, run-off, underground flow and change in soil moisture storage respectively. Other methods of estimating or predicting crop-water requirement includes the use of Standard Pan Evaporimeter (Pruitt, 2008), which takes into account the wind velocity, temperature, radiation and humidity and calculated as: ???????????????????????????????????????????????? = ???????????????? ???????? (3) where ETcrop is the reference crop evapotranspiration, Eo is the standard pan evaporation, K is the Pan coefficient. Maize or corn is a cereal crop that is grown widely throughout the world in a range of agro ecological environment (Michael, 2009). More maize is being produced annually across the world than any other grain (FAO, 2013). The crop exists and consists of different colours, textures and grain shapes and sizes. The white, yellow and red maize are the most commonly cultivated and used types. (Gilliam et al., 1993). Literature revealed that there are many valuable theoretical attempts and complicated models to estimate water requirements of crops, notably maize, cotton, wheat, tea, rice, radish and cowpea using equations such as the Penman (1948), Pan Evaporator and Lysimeters (Dahmardeh et al., 2010; Akinifesi et al., 2006; Amede and Nigatu, 2001; Grant et al., 1989; Kowal and Kassam, 1973). These studies did not consider the pattern of water use periods with hydraulic properties of the soils. The availability of water (Hamdy et al., 2003), its movement and its retention are governed by the properties of the soil especially texture. Authors agreed that different crops have different water use requirements under the same weather conditions. (FAO, 2013; Evett, 2013). Effective management of water resources for crop production requires the need to understand the influence of soil and water on crop, especially maize due to its worldwide importance for food and industries. Literature is scanty on documented evidence of water-use pattern during the growth stages of crops on soils with moderately rapid hydraulic conductivity (Lipiec and Hakansson, 2000; Gicheru et al., 2004). This information is important for planning the cropping periods of the crop, reducing crop failure and increasing productivity. In this study, we estimated the water use of maize crop at growth stages by the simplified empirical water balance model of Blaney and Criddle (1950). We also provided functional models relating water use of the crop during the growing season with leaf area (LA) and leaf area index (LAI). This will provided input data for better planning of the cropping cycles, to reduce the risk of crop failure and increase yield. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Study Area This study was conducted at the Teaching and Research farm of the University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria (Latitude 04°15′N and Longitude 07°15′E). The area is characterized with more than 2400 mm annual rainfall, mean annual temperature of about 29°C, and 89-93% relative humidity. The soil is derived from the coastal plain sands and classified as Arenic acrisol (USDA, 2012). It is coarse textured, highly weathered soils occurring south of the south-eastern Nigeria and have low activity clays (Agboola, 2000). Saturated hydraulic conductivity is moderately rapid (21.0 cm hr-1) and low water retention characteristics (Table 1). During the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons which the experiments were conducted, the mean monthly rainfall (Pmean), minimum temperature (Tmin), maximum temperature (Tmax) mean temperature (Tmean), and sunshine hours (Rs) were obtained at the Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Port Harcourt weather station on a daily basis and averaged on the growing seasons (May – August) (Table 2). Table 1. Some physical properties of soil of the experimental site Soil properties Sand Silt Clay Textural class Bulk density Total porosity Water holding capacity Saturated hydraulic conductivity Permeability class Unit g kg-1 g kg-1 g kg-1 g cm-3 % g g-1 cm hr-1 - Value 684 211 105 Sandy loam 1.43 32.5 0.23 21.3 Moderately rapid 2.2. Cropping and Crop Data Collection The experiment was arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) in four replications. The maize variety (FAZE 7) was planted in two seasons. In the first planting season, the crop was planted on May 3, 2016 and harvested in July 29, 2016. The second planting was on May 24, 2017 and harvested in August 19, 2017. The planting was done on a uniformly cropped area of 0.45 ha with plant population of about 23,000 plants ha-1. Basal rate of poultry manure at 10 tons ha-1 was applied during the 2 cropping seasons to International Journal of Plant Research 2019, 9(1): 1-7 3 increase the soil fertility. Maize plant height and leaf area were measured at the crop's growth stages (FAO, 1979) viz: 0 - establishment (at 10% of vegetative phase) (28 – 30 days after planting) (DAP), 1 - vegetative (at 80% of vegetative phase) (40 - 48 DAP), 2 - tasseling (65 - 72 DAP) and 3 - cob setting/cop filling (83 - 91 DAP) and grain yield at maturity. Leaf area (A) was determined by the method of Shih and Gastro (1990) as: ???????? = ???????????????????????? (4) where A = leaf area (cm2), L = leaf length (cm), B = breath at mid-point, and K = reduction factor determined for the crop under investigation. Table 2. Mean seasonal (May – August) meteorological data during the 2016 – 2017 period Growth stages 0-Establishment 1-Vegetative 2-Tasseling 3-Cobsetting/cob filling 4-Maturity Mean Month May June July August August Pmean (mm) 227 315 440 504 352 368 Tmin (mm) 25 25 23 24 24 24 Tmax (mm) 31 29 29 28 28 29 Tmean (mm) 28 27 26 Rs (hrs) 7.41 7.23 6.11 RHmean (%) 90 89 89 Stnd. Pan (mm) 4.24 5.41 4.42 26 5.43 91 4.43 26 5.21 91 4.11 27 6.28 90 4.53 Pmean- mean rainfall, Tmin – mean temperature, Tmax- maximum temperature, Tmean- mean temperature, Rs- mean sunshine hours, RHmean- mean relative humidity, Stnd. Pan- Standard pan evaporator 2.3. Maximum Evapotranspiration Estimation (ETm) The maximum evapotranspiration (ETm) at the growth stages of the crop was computed for the growing period by the modified Blaney and Criddle (1950) and Allen et al. (1998) equations: ???????????????????????? = ???????????????? ???????????????? (5) where ETm is the maximum crop evapotranspiration (mm), Kc is crop consumptive use coefficient and fc the consumptive use factor, computed from the meteorological data for the growing periods. Data collected on Class “A” Pan Evaporimeter during the period was also used in determining the reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) using the formulae of Penman (1948) as: ???????????????????????? = ???????????????????????? (6) ???????????????????????????????????????????????? = ????????????????????????. ???????????????? (7) where ETo is reference evapotranspiration (mm), Eo is Standard Pan Evaporation (mm), K and Kc are standard pan coefficient and crop coefficient respectively (dimensionless). In order to obtain the crop water requirement ETcrop), the reference crop evaporation (ETo) was multiplied by the crop coefficient (Kc) (Allen et al., 1998). The crop coefficient varied according to the growth stages. The consumptive water use was calculated at the crop development stages during the growth period, corresponding to mean number of days after planting. Adjustment for growth periods was estimated by multiplying the consumptive use period by the number of days for the growth stage. 2.4. Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analysis The disturbed bulk and core soil sample were collected at the 0-15 cm top soil for analysis of some hydrological and structural properties of the soil could affect water movement into and within the soil. The disturbed soil samples were sieved through 2 mm sieve and stored in plastic containers for laboratory analysis. 2.4.1. Determination of Particle Size-distribution, Bulk Density, and Total Porosity Particle size distribution was determined by the method of Gee and Bauder (1986) after dispersion with sodium haxametaphosphate. The bulk density was determined with core sample (Grossman and Reinsch, 2002) and calculated as: Bulk density = ???????????????? (????????) ???????????????? (???????????????? 3) (8) Where, Md is mass of oven-dried soil and Vb is the volume of bulk soil. Total porosity was calculated with core samples using the method of Flint and Flint (2002) as: %???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? = ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? (???????????????? 3) ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? (???????????????? 3) х 100 1 (9) This method is suitable for sandy soils, because, at saturation (0 kpa) tension after 24 hours, all the pore spaces are filled up. 2.4.2. Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Water Holding Capacity Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) was measured by the constant head soil core method (Reynolds et al., 2002). Leachate volume was measured over time until flow was constant at which time the final flow rate was determined from the equation ???????????????????????????????? = ???????? ???????????????? х ???????? ∆???????? (10) where Ksat is saturated hydraulic conductivity (cm h-1), Q is volume of water (cm3) that flows through a cross-sectional area A (cm2), T is time (s), L is length of core (cm), and ∆H is 4 Bassey E. Udom and Onyinyechi J. Kamalu: Crop Water Requirements during Growth Period of Maize (Zea mays L.) in a Moderate Permeability Soil on Coastal Plain Sands hydraulic head difference (cm). Permeability class was according to Soil Survey Staff (1993). Water holding capacity was calculated as: ???????????????????????? (???????? ???????? − 1) = ???????????????? −???????????????? ???????????????? (11) Where Mw is mass of wet soil at 0 kpa potential and Md is mass of oven-dried soil at 105°C. 2.5. Data Analysis Data on crop water requirements at growth stages were analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparisons using the SAS software (SAS, 2001). Means were separated by the least significant difference using the Fisher’s protected test (Gomez and Gomez, 1984) at 5% probability. Correlation analysis was used to determine the relationships between some growth parameters and water use pattern. Significant correlation coefficient was tested at 5% probability. 3. Results 3.1. Crop Water Requirements Table 3. Computed water use for maize at growth stages with the Blaney-Criddle equation Growth stages 0-Establishment (21 DAP) 1-Vegetative (44 DAP) 2-Tasseling (68 DAP) 3-Cob setting/cob filling (87 DAP) 4-Maturty (92 DAP) Total Mean Water use per growth stages (mm) 48.6c 105.9b 141.4a 126.6a 34.4c 456.9 91.38 Water use (mm day-1) 2.31c 4.41b 5.66a 6.31a 2.4c 21.09 4.22 DAP- days after planting, Means followed by the same letter were not significantly different at p < 0.05 Table 4. Computed water use of maize at growth stages by Standard Pan Evaporation Growth stages 0-Establishment (21 DAP) 1-Vegetative (44 DAP) 2-Tasseling (68 DAP) 3-Cob setting/cob filling (87 DAP) 4-Maturty (92 DAP) Total Mean Pan evaporation (mm day-1) ETo (mm day-1) ETcrop (mm day-1) 4.24b 2.15c 2.51b 5.41a 4.63a 4.98a 4.42a 3.01b 5.03a 4.43a 3.78b 4.36a 4.11b 22.61 4.52 2.46c 12.25 2.45 2.64b 19.52 3.91 DAP- days after planting, Means followed by the same letter were not significantly different at p < 0.05 The pattern of crop water requirement computed with the Bleney-Criddle formula and Pan evaporative data are shown in Tables 3 and 4. The crop seasonal water requirement was 456.9 mm computed with the Bleney-Criddle formula (Table 3). Mean daily water requirements during the growing season were 4.22 mm and 3.91 mm obtained with the Bleney-Criddle and Pan Evaporation formulae respectively. Seasonal and daily water use pattern varied significantly (p < 0.05) at growth stages of the maize crop, showing significant increase at periods of rapid growth and declined at maturity. Peak water use period was found during the tasseling and cob setting/cob filling growth stages at 68 and 87 days after planting (DAP) respectively. At tasselling and cob setting/cob filling, daily water use were 5.66 and 6.31 mm respectively (Table 3), while reference crop evapotranspiration (ETcrop) obtained from Pan evaporation were 5.03 and 4.36 mm respectively during similar growth periods (Table 4). There was non-significant (p > 0.05) different in the amount of water used by the crop at establishment and maturity growth periods, indicating rapid decline between cob setting/cob filling and maturity (from 6.31 mm day-1 to 2.4 mm day-1, and a sharp increase between establishment and maximum vegetative period (2.31 mm day-1 to 4.41 mm day-1) at 44 DAP. More than 82% of the crop seasonal water requirement was used during vegetative, tasseling and yield formation growth stages that was 23%, 31% and 28% respectively. 3.2. Growth Parameters Table 5. Plant height and leaf area index of maize plant at growth stages Growth stages 0-Establishment (21 DAP) 1-Vegetative (44 DAP) 2-Tasseling (68 DAP) 3-Cob setting/cob filling (87 DAP) 4-Maturty (92 DAP) Plant height (cm) 57.3c 104.5b 153.3a 161.1a 162.7a Leaf area index 0.84c 3.12b 4.11a 4.23a 3.00b DAP- days after planting, Means followed by the same letter were not significantly different at p < 0.05 Table 6. Functional model between water use and leaf area index, plant height, saturated hydraulic conductivity and particle size Independent Leaf area Plant height Ksat Sand Clay Equation Y = 12.04 + 1.617x Y = 22.01 + 0.914x Y = 0.823 + 1.072x Y = 1.601 + 0.836x Y = - 0.621 +0.511x R2 0.604* 0.620* 0.415ns 0.521* 0.341 R 0.777* 0.788* 0.644ns 0.722* -0.584 *significant at p < 0.05, R2 – coefficient of determination, R – coefficient of correlation, Ksat – saturated hydraulic conductivity Table 5 showed that there was non-significant (p > 0.05) in plant height of the maize at maximum vegetative (44 DAP), tasseling (68 DAP) and yield formation (87 DAP), growth periods. Maximum plant height of 161.1 cm with International Journal of Plant Research 2019, 9(1): 1-7 5 corresponding leaf area index (LAI) of 4.23 cm was attained at cob setting/ cob filling period. The lowest plant height \of 57.3 cm and LAI of 0.84 were obtained at the establishment growth period. There was a marginal decrease in LAI at maturity due to shrinking of the upper leaves and drying up of the lower leaves. Functional relationships in Table 6 showed significant linear model between water use and plant height (Y = 22.01+0.914x, R2 = 0.620, p < 0.05), and LAI (Y = 12.0 + 1.617x, R 2 = 0.604, p < 0.05). The model accounted for 62% and 60.4% of the data respectively, indicating that as plant height and LAI increases, amount of water needed and/or used by the crop increases. These models could be used to estimate the amount of water used by the maize crop. Relationships between water use and soil particle fractions showed significant positive linear model with sand fractions (Y = 1.601 + 0.836x, R2 = 0.521, p < 0.05) and a non-significant relationship with clay fractions (Y = -0.621 + 0.511x, R2 = 0.341, p > -0.584), indicating that clay fraction limits the amount of water used by the crop. 4. Discussions The soil is sandy loam and moderate permeability and had influence in the amount of water used by the crop. The soil satisfied the use of modified Blaney-Criddle and water balance formulae in which water used by the crop is usually obtained from irrigation and/or rainfall minus deep percolation (Smith et al., 2002, Smith et al., 2005). The low amount of water used during establishment period (21 DAP), was most probably due to the number and size of leaves and the plant height which also affected the reference crop evapotranspiration. This is consistent with previous reports by Broner and Schneekloth (2003) and Bob (2015) who related the development stages of crop and associated canopy densities to the crop water requirement and irrigation scheduling. On the other hand, the sharp increase in the amount of water used by the maize during tasseling (68 DAP) and yield formation period (87 DAP), and rapid decline at maturity was not surprising. This is because; crop water requirements tend to increase at periods of maximum vegetative growth and yield formation, which is consistent with previous reports by Allen et al. (1998) and Barhom (2012) that the critical water used period of crops were during flowering and periods following yield formation. However, the amount of water used during the growing season was lower than the upper limit obtained for the drier northern Nigeria, due to the more humid nature of the southern Nigeria, and differences in planting and harvesting dates (Agboola, 2000). Similarly, the influence of climate and planting dates further confirmed the low values of crop water use calculated with the Standard Pan Evaporimeter. Low leaf area index (LAI) found at maturity compared with value obtained during yield formation period could be linked to shrinkage and low turgidity of the leaves due to low water content commonly found in older leaves. The significant positive model relating LAI and plant height can be used to predict the amount of water required by maize or similar plants. Modeling crop water requirements with the LAI and plant height provided simple linear relationships for irrigation scheduling (Djaman et al., 2018). The non-significant linear relationships between clay content and water use and significant positive relationship with the sand content further confirmed the high energy of soil water in clay soils (Udom and Kamalu, 2016). 5. Conclusions It is concluded through this study that: The seasonal water use of maize crop depends on planting and harvesting dates. The average amount of water used by the maize during the growing seasons (early May – August) was 456.9 mm. Mean daily water use rate was 4.22 mm day-1 and 3.91 mm day-1 with the Blaney-Criddle and Pan Evaporation data respectively. Peak period of water use was during tasseling and yield formation stage. Pan Evaporation data was influenced by the month and season of the year, as maximum evapotranspiration was low during the wet season. Linear model predicting seasonal and daily water use pattern was 78% for LAI and 79% for plant height. Sand content showed a positive relationship with water used by the crop, while clay content has a non-significant negative influence on the water use pattern of the crop. The Blaney-Criddle and Pan Evaporation formulae can be used to calculate the seasonal and daily water pattern of maize crop in moderate permeability sandy loam soils. REFERENCES [1] Agboola, S. O. 2000. An Agricultural Atlas of Nigeria. Oxford University Press, Ibadan, Nigeria. [2] Akinifesi, F. K., Makumba, W. and Kwesiga, F. R. 2006. Sustainable maize production using Gliricidia/maize intercropping in southern Malawi. Exp. Agric. 42:441-457. [3] Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome. [4] Amede, T. and Nigatu, Y. 2001. Interaction of components of sweet potato-maize intercropping under the semi-arid conditions of Rift-Valley, Ethiopia. Tropical Agriculture 78: 1-7. [5] Barhom, T. I. H. 2012. Studies on water requirements for some crops under different cropping systems. M.Sc. Thesis, faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University. [6] Blaney, H. F. and Criddle, W. D. 1950. Determining Water Requirements in Irrigated Area from Climatological Irrigation Data. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Technical Paper No. 96, 48pp. 6 Bassey E. Udom and Onyinyechi J. Kamalu: Crop Water Requirements during Growth Period of Maize (Zea mays L.) in a Moderate Permeability Soil on Coastal Plain Sands [7] Bob, S. B. 2015. Irrigation scheduling and evapotranspiration. [21] Hamdy, A., Ragab, R. and Scarascia-Mugnozza, E. 2003. Santa Clara Valley Water District, Water Use Efficiency Unit, Coping with water scarcity: water saving and increasing San Jose, CA 95128. water productivity. Irrigation and Drainage 52: 3-20. [8] Broner, I. and Schneekloth, J. 2003. Seasonal water needs and opportunities for limited irrigation for Colorado Crops. Newsletter of the Extension Irrigation Services, Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, No: 4, 718. [9] Dahmardeh, M. A., Ghanbari, B. A., Syahsar and Ramrodi, M 2010. The role intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on yield and soil chemical properties. African J. Agric. Res. 5: 631-636. [10] Djaman, K., Mel, V. C., Balde, A. B., Bado, B. V., Diop, L., Manneh, B., Mutiibwa, D., Rudnick, D., Irmak, S. and Futakuchi, K. 2017. Evapotranspiration, irrigation water requirement and water productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the Sahelian Environment. Paddy and Water Environment 15: 469-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0564-9. [11] Djaman, K., O’Neill, M., Owen, C.K., Koudahe, K., West, M., Smeal, D., Allen, S., Lombard, K. and Irmak, S. 2018. Crop evapotranspiration, irrigation water requirement and water productivity of maize from meteorological data under semiarid climate. Water 10: 405.https://doi.org/10.3390/w10 040405. [12] Evett, R. S. 2013. Accuracy and precision of soil water measurements by Neutron capacitant and TDR methods, In: Proceedings of 17th Water Conservation Soil Society Symposium, Thailand, 2002. [13] FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization), 2013. A Computer Programme for Irrigation Planning and Management, Smith, M. (ed.). Irrigation and Drainage Paper No: 46. Rome. [14] Flint, L. E. and Flint, A. L. 2002. Pore-size distribution. In: Dane, J. H. and Topp, G. C. (eds.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I, Physical Methods, Asa and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 246-253. [15] Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W. 1986. Particle size analysis. In: Klute, A. (Ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1: Agron Monogr. No. 9. 2nd ed. pp. 383-411. [16] Gicheru, P. Gachene, C., Mbuvi, J. and Mare, E. 2004. Effects of soil management practices and tillage systems on surface soil water conservation and crust formation on sandy loam in semi-arid Kenya. Soil & Tillage Research 75: 173-184. [17] Gilliam, J. W., Robinson, J. L., Brinsfield, R. B., Staver, K. W., Lucas, W. and Todd, A. H. 1993. Water quality functions of Riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake watersheds. Environ. Manage. 21: 687-712. [18] Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed., Wiley Interscience Publication, Singapore. [19] Grant, R. F., Jackson, B. S. Kiniry, J. R. and Arkin, G. P. 1989. Water deficit timing effects on yield components of maize. Agron. J. 84: 61-65. [20] Grossman, R. B. and Reinsch, T. G. 2002. Bulk density and linear extensibility. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4, Physical Methods, Dane, J. H. and Topp, G. C. (eds.). ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI., USA. pp. 201-228. [22] Kowal, J. M. and Kassam, A. H. 1973. Water use, energy balance and growth of maize at Samaru, Northern Nigeria. Agricultural. Meteorology 12: 391-408. [23] Lipiec, J. and Hakansson, J. 2000. Influences of degree of compactness and matric water tension on some important plant growth factors. Soil & Tillage Research 53: 87-94. [24] McVicar, M., Morgan, K. T., Hanlon, E. A. and Obreza, T. A. 2005. A Web-Based Model to Improve Water Use Efficiecy and Reduce Nutrient Leaching for Florida Citrus SS499. Gainesville, University of Florida, Istitute of Food and Agrcultural Sciences, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/ss499. [25] Michael, J. H. 2009. An improved water-use efficiency for maize grown under regulated deficit irrigation. Field Crop Research 67: 207-214. [26] Nagesawara, R. L., Simmonds, L. P., Azam-Ali, S. N. and Williams, J. I. 1989. Population, growth, and water use of groundnut maintained on stored water 1: Root and shoot growth. Exp. Agric. 25: 51-61. [27] Olasantan, F. O. 2008. The effect of soil temperature and moisture content on crop growth and yield of intercropping maize and yam. Exp. Agric. 24: 67-74. [28] Penman, H. L. 1948. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Procceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 193: 120-148. [29] Pruitt, G. 2008. Implementation of FAO-56 Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration in a large scale irrigation scheduling. Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Alaska, USA. [30] Reichardt, L., Hook, J. E. and Gascho, G. J. 2012. Multiple copping for effeccient use of water and nitrogen. In: Cropping Strategies for Efficient use of Water and Nitrogen. [31] Hargrove, W. L. (Ed.). America Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 7-20. [32] Reynolds, W.D., Elick, D.E., Youngs, E.G., Amoozegar, A. and Bootink, N.W. 2002. Saturated and Field-saturated Water Flow Parameters, In: Dane, J.H., Topp, G.C. (eds.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4. SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 797–878. [33] SAS–Statistical Analysis System. 2001. Institute SAS/STAT User’s Guide, 4th ed., Vol. 1.SAS Inst. Cary, NC, USA. [34] Shih, S. F. and Gascho, G. J. 1990. Relationship among stalk length, leaf area and dry biomass of sugarcane. Agron. J. 72: 309-313. [35] Smith, J. A., Lal, R. and Russel, E. W. 2005. Soil conditions and plant growth, 12th Edition. [36] Smith, M., Ruben, J. and Kivumbi, D. 2002. Use of FAO CROPWAT model in deficit irrigation studies. FAO Water Reports 22: 17-28. [37] Soil Survey Staff 1993. Soil Survey Manual. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, Agricultural Handbook No. 18, Print International Journal of Plant Research 2019, 9(1): 1-7 7 Office, Washington, DC, USA. [38] Udom, B. E. and Kamalu, O. J. 2016. Sealing index, air-filled porosity and hydrological behaviour of a Tropical ultisol as affected by incidental flooding and soil disturbance. Int. J. Soil Sci. 11: 79-86. [39] USDA–U. S. Department of Agriculture. 2012. Soil Survey Manual (Revised). USDA, Print Office, Washington, DC, USA. [40] Varga, B., Varga-Laszlo, E., Bencze, S., Balla, K. and Veisz, O. (2013) Water Use of Winter Cereals under Well-Watered and Drought Stressed Conditions. Plant, Soil and Environment, 59, 150-155. https://doi.org/10.17221/658/201 2-PSE. [41] Wright, G. C. and Bell, M. F. 1992. Plant population studies on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in subtropical Australia 3: Growth and water use during a terminal draught stress. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 32: 197-203.

... pages left unread,continue reading

Document pages: 7 pages

Please select stars to rate!

         

0 comments Sign in to leave a comment.

    Data loading, please wait...
×