eduzhai > Applied Sciences > Transportation >

How the Supreme Courts New Definition of Vessel is Affecting Seaman Status, Admiralty Jurisdiction, and Other Areas of Maritime Law

  • Save

... pages left unread,continue reading

Document pages: 42 pages

Abstract: Section 3 of the Rules of Construction Act provides that "the word vessel includes every description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water. " This definition has been on the books since 1873. But it did not receive the Supreme Court s full blessing until 2005, when the Court held in Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co. that the 1873 statute "codified the meaning that the term vessel had acquired in general maritime law " and that "section 3 continues to supply the default definition of vessel throughout the U.S. Code, unless the context indicates otherwise. " The immediate issue in Stewart was how to define vessel for purposes of determining an injured worker s status as a seaman, but the Court s embrace of section 3 in Stewart is affecting many other areas of admiralty and maritime law as well. This article summarizes the Stewart decision and tries to correct a mistaken reading that is occurring with some frequency. It lays a foundation for exploring Stewart s effects on the law by explaining how the decision broadened the meaning of "vessel " in some contexts but may have narrowed it in others, and goes into detail respecting the impact on seaman status, with emphasis on the frequently litigated issue of whether casino boat workers (bartenders, croupiers, dealers, etc.) are seamen under the Jones Act. It then looks at the effects of Stewart on admiralty jurisdiction more generally in tort and contract, including possible effects on actions under section 5 of the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, on the Coast Guard s authority, on shipowners petitions for limitation of liability, and on ship mortgages. It concludes with proposals for dealing with some of the difficulties engendered by the Stewart decision.

Please select stars to rate!

         

0 comments Sign in to leave a comment.

    Data loading, please wait...
×